IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0008868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking mosquito surveillance to dengue fever through Bayesian mechanistic modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Clinton B Leach
  • Jennifer A Hoeting
  • Kim M Pepin
  • Alvaro E Eiras
  • Mevin B Hooten
  • Colleen T Webb

Abstract

Our ability to effectively prevent the transmission of the dengue virus through targeted control of its vector, Aedes aegypti, depends critically on our understanding of the link between mosquito abundance and human disease risk. Mosquito and clinical surveillance data are widely collected, but linking them requires a modeling framework that accounts for the complex non-linear mechanisms involved in transmission. Most critical are the bottleneck in transmission imposed by mosquito lifespan relative to the virus’ extrinsic incubation period, and the dynamics of human immunity. We developed a differential equation model of dengue transmission and embedded it in a Bayesian hierarchical framework that allowed us to estimate latent time series of mosquito demographic rates from mosquito trap counts and dengue case reports from the city of Vitória, Brazil. We used the fitted model to explore how the timing of a pulse of adult mosquito control influences its effect on the human disease burden in the following year. We found that control was generally more effective when implemented in periods of relatively low mosquito mortality (when mosquito abundance was also generally low). In particular, control implemented in early September (week 34 of the year) produced the largest reduction in predicted human case reports over the following year. This highlights the potential long-term utility of broad, off-peak-season mosquito control in addition to existing, locally targeted within-season efforts. Further, uncertainty in the effectiveness of control interventions was driven largely by posterior variation in the average mosquito mortality rate (closely tied to total mosquito abundance) with lower mosquito mortality generating systems more vulnerable to control. Broadly, these correlations suggest that mosquito control is most effective in situations in which transmission is already limited by mosquito abundance.Author summary: The contribution of the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti to the spread of dengue fever depends not only on their abundance, but also on the likelihood of an exposed mosquito living long enough to incubate the dengue virus and subsequently transmit it to a susceptible human host. We developed a mechanistic model that accounts for the role of this process in the dynamics of dengue fever and fit the model to a time series of human case reports and mosquito trap counts from the city of Vitória, Brazil. We then used this fitted model to simulate the effect of mosquito control implemented at different times of the year and found that mosquito control leads to the largest reduction in human dengue cases over the following year when implemented in early September, during the dengue off-season. Further, the effectiveness of mosquito control was strongly negatively correlated with the overall average abundance of mosquitoes. Together with the timing of effective control, these results suggest that mosquito control is most effective when mosquitoes are already limiting to transmission.

Suggested Citation

  • Clinton B Leach & Jennifer A Hoeting & Kim M Pepin & Alvaro E Eiras & Mevin B Hooten & Colleen T Webb, 2020. "Linking mosquito surveillance to dengue fever through Bayesian mechanistic modeling," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008868
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008868
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008868&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.