IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0007808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential impact of mass and targeted praziquantel delivery on schistosomiasis control in school-aged children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle M Cribb
  • Naomi E Clarke
  • Suhail A R Doi
  • Susana Vaz Nery

Abstract

Background: Schistosomiasis is a widespread public health concern in the poorest regions of the world. The principal control strategy is regular praziquantel administration to school-aged children in endemic areas. With calls for the elimination of schistosomiasis as a public health problem, expanding praziquantel delivery to all community members has been advocated. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the impact of community-wide and child-targeted praziquantel distribution on schistosomiasis prevalence and intensity in school-aged children. Methodology/Principal findings: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science to identify papers that reported schistosome prevalence before and after praziquantel administration, either to children only or to all community members. Extracted data included Schistosoma species, drug administration strategy, number of treatment rounds, follow-up interval and prevalence and intensity before and after treatment. We used inverse variance weighted generalised linear models to examine the impact of mass versus targeted drug administration on prevalence reduction, and weighted boxplots to examine the impact on infection intensity reduction. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018095377. Conclusions/Significance: The results of this meta-analysis do not support the hypothesis that community-wide treatment is more effective than targeted treatment at reducing schistosomiasis infections in children. This may be due to the relatively small number of included studies, insufficient treatment coverage, persistent infection hotspots and unmeasured confounders. Further field-based studies comparing mass and targeted treatment are required. Author summary: Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease, caused by parasitic worms, that affects more than 143 million people worldwide. Chronic infections can lead to significant morbidity including kidney damage, anaemia, malnutrition, infertility and growth impairment. School-aged children between six and 15 years are often targeted for regular treatment with praziquantel in large-scale drug delivery programs, because they suffer a disproportionate burden of morbidity. On the other hand, a mass drug delivery strategy that treats all members of the community has been suggested in a move towards elimination of schistosomiasis as a public health problem. In this systematic review, we assess the impact of community-wide versus children-only praziquantel distribution in reducing schistosomiasis infections in school-aged children. We did not detect a difference between mass and targeted treatment strategies, possibly due to factors including insufficient treatment coverage and persistent sources of reinfection. Addressing these factors may assist in optimising control programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle M Cribb & Naomi E Clarke & Suhail A R Doi & Susana Vaz Nery, 2019. "Differential impact of mass and targeted praziquantel delivery on schistosomiasis control in school-aged children: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0007808
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0007808
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0007808&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0007808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.