Author
Listed:
- Kartika Saraswati
- Meghna Phanichkrivalkosil
- Nicholas P J Day
- Stuart D Blacksell
Abstract
Background: Scrub typhus is a neglected tropical disease that causes acute febrile illness. Diagnosis is made based upon serology, or detection of the causative agent–Orientia tsutsugamushi–using PCR or in vitro isolation. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is an objective and reproducible means of detecting IgM or IgG antibodies. However, lack of standardization in ELISA methodology, as well as in the choice of reference test with which the ELISA is compared, calls into question the validity of cut-offs used in diagnostic accuracy studies and observational studies. Methodology/Principal findings: A PubMed search and manual screening of reference lists identified 46 studies that used ELISA antibody cut-offs to diagnose scrub typhus patients, 22 of which were diagnostic accuracy studies. Overall, 22 studies (47.8%) provided little to no explanation as to how the ELISA cut-off was derived, and 7 studies (15.2%) did not even state the cut-off used. Variation was seen locally in reference standards used, in terms of both the diagnostic test and cut-off titer. Furthermore, with the exception of studies using ELISAs manufactured by InBios, there was no standardization of the selection of antigenic strains. As a result, no consensus was found for determining a cut-off, ELISA methodology, or for a single value diagnostic cut-off. Conclusions/Significance: We have concluded that there is a lack of consensus in the determination of a cut-off. We recommend interpreting the results from these studies with caution. Further studies will need to be performed at each geographic location to determine region-specific cut-offs, taking into consideration background antibody levels to discriminate true disease from healthy individuals. Author summary: Scrub typhus is a neglected tropical disease that causes acute fever and can cause serious complications without appropriate antibiotic treatment. Diagnosis is usually made by the detection of specific antibodies or the causative agent–Orientia tsutsugamushi. Specific antibodies can be detected using ELISA technology however there is an apparent lack of standardization in the development of cut-offs used in diagnostic accuracy studies and observational studies. This study assessed 46 studies that used ELISA antibody cut-offs to diagnose scrub typhus patients. Overall, 22 studies (47.8%) provided little to no explanation as to how the ELISA cut-off was derived, and 7 studies (15.2%) did not even state the cut-off used. Furthermore, with the exception of studies using ELISAs manufactured by InBios company, there was no standard approach to the selection of antigenic strains, and therefore they may not be representative of the local antigenic strains causing disease. As a result, we have concluded that there is a lack of consensus in the determination of a cut-off. We recommend interpreting the results from these studies with caution and further studies will need to be conducted at each geographic location to determine region-specific cut-offs take into consideration background antibody levels to discriminate true disease from healthy individuals.
Suggested Citation
Kartika Saraswati & Meghna Phanichkrivalkosil & Nicholas P J Day & Stuart D Blacksell, 2019.
"The validity of diagnostic cut-offs for commercial and in-house scrub typhus IgM and IgG ELISAs: A review of the evidence,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0007158
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007158
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0007158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.