IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0006986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interventions to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis in children: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Uribe-Restrepo
  • Alexandra Cossio
  • Mayur M Desai
  • Diana Dávalos
  • María del Mar Castro

Abstract

Background: Case management in children with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is mainly based on studies performed in adults. We aimed to determine the efficacy and harms of interventions to treat CL in children. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and cohort studies, assessing treatments of CL in children (≤12 years old). We performed structured searches in PubMed, CENTRAL, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar. No restrictions regarding ethnicity, country, sex or year of publication were applied. Languages were limited to English, Spanish and Portuguese. Two reviewers screened articles, completed the data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. A qualitative summary of the included studies was performed. Results: We identified 1092 records, and included 8 manuscripts (6 Randomized Clinical Trials [RCT] and 2 non-randomized studies). Most of the articles excluded in full-text review did not report outcomes separately for children. In American CL (ACL), 5 studies evaluated miltefosine and/or meglumine antimoniate (MA). Their efficacy varied from 68–83% and 17–69%, respectively. In Old-World CL (OWCL), two studies evaluated systemic therapies: rifampicin and MA; and one study assessed efficacy of cryotherapy (42%, Per Protocol [PP]) vs intralesional MA (72%, PP). Few studies (4) provided information on adverse events (AEs) for children, and no serious AEs were reported in participants. Risk of bias was generally low to unclear in ACL studies, and unclear to high in OWCL studies. Conclusion: Information on efficacy of treatment for CL in children is scarce. There is an unmet need to develop specific formulations, surveillance of AEs, and guidelines both for the management of CL and clinical trials involving the pediatric population. Registration: The protocol of this review was registered in the PROSPERO International register of systematic reviews, number CRD42017062164. Author summary: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a parasitic disease that causes chronic, often ulcerated, skin lesions that leave lifelong scars on the face or other visible areas. In some regions of the world, children represent a high proportion of cases. Treatment options for children are limited, and may require administration of poorly tolerated drugs. Despite the differences in responses to these drugs, treatment regimens for children are based on extrapolation of efficacy data in adults. We systematically reviewed the medical literature, searching for controlled studies assessing treatments for CL in children. Eight articles (461 patients aged 2–15 years) were included. None of the studies enrolled children

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Uribe-Restrepo & Alexandra Cossio & Mayur M Desai & Diana Dávalos & María del Mar Castro, 2018. "Interventions to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis in children: A systematic review," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006986
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0006986
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0006986&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006986?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.