IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0006809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic value of identifying and treating Chagas disease patients earlier and the impact on Trypanosoma cruzi transmission

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah M Bartsch
  • Cameron M Avelis
  • Lindsey Asti
  • Daniel L Hertenstein
  • Martial Ndeffo-Mbah
  • Alison Galvani
  • Bruce Y Lee

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization’s 2020 Goals for Chagas disease include access to antiparasitic treatment and care of all infected/ill patients. Policy makers need to know the economic value of identifying and treating patients earlier. However, the economic value of earlier treatment to cure and prevent the Chagas’ spread remains unknown. Methods: We expanded our existing Chagas disease transmission model to include identification and treatment of Chagas disease patients. We linked this to a clinical and economic model that translated chronic Chagas disease cases into health and economic outcomes. We evaluated the impact and economic outcomes (costs, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit) of identifying and treating different percentages of patients in the acute and indeterminate disease states in a 2,000-person village in Yucatan, Mexico. Results: In the absence of early treatment, 50 acute and 22 new chronic cases occurred over 50 years. Identifying and treating patients in the acute stage averted 0.5–5.4 acute cases, 0.6–5.5 chronic cases, and 0.6–10.8 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), saving $694-$7,419 and $6,976-$79,950 from the third-party payer and societal perspectives, respectively. Treating in the indeterminate stage averted 2.2–4.9 acute cases, 6.1–12.8 chronic cases, and 11.7–31.1 DALYs, saving $7,666-$21,938 from the third-party payer perspective and $90,530-$243,068 from the societal perspective. Treating patients in both stages averted ≤9 acute cases and ≤15 chronic cases. Identifying and treating patients early was always economically dominant compared to no treatment. Identifying and treating patients earlier resulted in a cumulative cost-benefit of $7,273-$224,981 at the current cost of identification and treatment. Conclusions: Even when identifying and treating as little as 5% of cases annually, treating Chagas cases in the acute and indeterminate stages reduces transmission and provides economic and health benefits. This supports the need for improved diagnostics and access to safe and effective treatment. Author summary: The World Health Organization’s 2020 Goals for Chagas disease include access to antiparasitic treatment and care of all infected/ill patients. Policy makers need to know the economic value of identifying and treating patients earlier and what can be invested. We evaluated the impact and economic outcomes (costs, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit) of identifying and treating different percentages of Chagas patients in the acute and indeterminate disease states using a transmission model linked to a clinical and economic outcomes model. Identifying and treating Chagas cases in the acute and indeterminate stages could result in up to an 18.0% relative reduction in transmission events as well as a 68.2% relative reduction in new chronic cases over 50 years compared to no treatment and was always economically dominant compared to no treatment. Identifying and treating Chagas disease in its earlier stages would reduce transmission and result in better health outcomes and cost-savings. In fact, the cost-savings would outweigh the cost of treating, meaning that earlier treatment may pay for itself. This supports the need for improved diagnostics and access to effective treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah M Bartsch & Cameron M Avelis & Lindsey Asti & Daniel L Hertenstein & Martial Ndeffo-Mbah & Alison Galvani & Bruce Y Lee, 2018. "The economic value of identifying and treating Chagas disease patients earlier and the impact on Trypanosoma cruzi transmission," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006809
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0006809
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0006809&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janine M Ramsey & Miguel Elizondo-Cano & Gilberto Sanchez-González & Adriana Peña-Nieves & Alejandro Figueroa-Lara, 2014. "Opportunity Cost for Early Treatment of Chagas Disease in Mexico," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-8, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandra Parisi & Miriam Navarro & Jeremy Douglas Du Plessis & Jonathan Phillip Shock & Boris Apodaca Michel & Minerva Lucuy Espinoza & Carolina Terán & Nino Antonio Calizaya Tapia & Katharina Oltmanns , 2020. "“We have already heard that the treatment doesn't do anything, so why should we take it?”: A mixed method perspective on Chagas disease knowledge, attitudes, prevention, and treatment behaviour in the," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.