IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0006789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of leprosy in the Chinese population based on a weighted genetic risk score

Author

Listed:
  • Na Wang
  • Zhenzhen Wang
  • Chuan Wang
  • Xi'an Fu
  • Gongqi Yu
  • Zhenhua Yue
  • Tingting Liu
  • Huimin Zhang
  • Lulu Li
  • Mingfei Chen
  • Honglei Wang
  • Guiye Niu
  • Dan Liu
  • Mingkai Zhang
  • Yuanyuan Xu
  • Yan Zhang
  • Jinghui Li
  • Zhen Li
  • Jiabao You
  • Tongsheng Chu
  • Furong Li
  • Dianchang Liu
  • Hong Liu
  • Furen Zhang

Abstract

Genome wide association studies (GWASs) have revealed multiple genetic variants associated with leprosy in the Chinese population. The aim of our study was to utilize the genetic variants to construct a risk prediction model through a weighted genetic risk score (GRS) in a Chinese set and to further assess the performance of the model in identifying higher-risk contact individuals in an independent set. The highest prediction accuracy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.743 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.729–0.757), was achieved with a GRS encompassing 25 GWAS variants in a discovery set that included 2,144 people affected by leprosy and 2,671 controls. Individuals in the high-risk group, based on genetic factors (GRS > 28.06), have a 24.65 higher odds ratio (OR) for developing leprosy relative to those in the low-risk group (GRS≤18.17). The model was then applied to a validation set consisting of 1,385 people affected by leprosy and 7,541 individuals in contact with leprosy, which yielded a discriminatory ability with an AUC of 0.707 (95% CI: 0.691–0.723). When a GRS cut-off value of 22.38 was selected with the optimal sensitivity and specificity, it was found that 39.31% of high risk contact individuals should be screened in order to detect leprosy in 64.9% of those people affected by leprosy. In summary, we developed and validated a risk model for the prediction of leprosy that showed good discrimination capabilities, which may help physicians in the identification of patients coming into contact with leprosy and are at a higher-risk of developing this condition.Author summary: Despite elimination efforts, the reported number of new leprosy patients has been relatively stable during the past decade throughout the world. Solid evidence exists that individuals living in close proximity to patients are at an increased risk of developing leprosy, thus identifying the contact individuals who are at a higher risk of developing leprosy is an important aspect of disease control. In the last decade, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified multiple genetic variants associated with leprosy in the Chinese population, however, the combined impact of these variants for leprosy risk prediction remains unclear. The goal of our study was to utilize the genetic variants to construct a risk prediction model in a Chinese set, and further assess the performance of the model in identifying higher-risk contact subjects in an independent set. We developed risk prediction models for leprosy based on GRS encompassing 25 GWAS-derived variants with good discriminatory capability (AUC = 0.743). When compared to the individuals in the high-risk group (GRS > 28.06) and low-risk group (GRS≤18.17), the former had a 24.65 times higher risk for developing leprosy than the latter, which demonstrated a considerable value for risk stratification in leprosy. Our results may assist physicians to identify higher-risk leprosy contact subjects for disease interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Wang & Zhenzhen Wang & Chuan Wang & Xi'an Fu & Gongqi Yu & Zhenhua Yue & Tingting Liu & Huimin Zhang & Lulu Li & Mingfei Chen & Honglei Wang & Guiye Niu & Dan Liu & Mingkai Zhang & Yuanyuan Xu & Ya, 2018. "Prediction of leprosy in the Chinese population based on a weighted genetic risk score," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006789
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0006789
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0006789&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.