IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0006713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving clinical and epidemiological predictors of Buruli ulcer

Author

Listed:
  • Gilbert Adjimon Ayelo
  • Ghislain Emmanuel Sopoh
  • Jean-Gabin Houezo
  • René Fiodessihoue
  • Dissou Affolabi
  • Ange Dodji Dossou
  • Yves Thierry Barogui
  • Akpeedje Anita Carolle Wadagni
  • Didier Codjo Agossadou
  • Epco Hasker
  • Françoise Portaels
  • Bouke C de Jong
  • Miriam Eddyani

Abstract

Background: Buruli ulcer (BU) is a chronic necrotizing infectious skin disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans. The treatment with BU-specific antibiotics is initiated after clinical suspicion based on the WHO clinical and epidemiological criteria. This study aimed to estimate the predictive values of these criteria and how they could be improved. Methodology/Principal findings: A total of 224 consecutive patients presenting with skin and soft tissue lesions that could be compatible with BU, including those recognized as unlikely BU by experienced clinicians, were recruited in two BU treatment centers in southern Benin between March 2012 and March 2015. For each participant, the WHO and four additional epidemiological and clinical diagnostic criteria were recorded. For microbiological confirmation, direct smear examination and IS2404 PCR were performed. We fitted a logistic regression model with PCR positivity for BU confirmation as outcome variable. On univariate analysis, most of the clinical and epidemiological WHO criteria were associated with a positive PCR result. However, lesions on the lower limbs and WHO category 3 lesions were rather associated with a negative PCR result (respectively OR: 0.4, 95%CI: 0.3–0.8; OR: 0.5, 95%IC: 0.3–0.9). Among the additional characteristics studied, the characteristic smell of BU was strongest associated with a positive PCR result (OR = 16.4; 95%CI = 7.5–35.6). Conclusion/Significance: The WHO diagnostic criteria could be improved upon by differentiating between lesions on the upper and lower limbs and by including lesion size and the characteristic smell recognized by experienced clinicians. Author summary: Buruli ulcer (BU) is a neglected necrotizing skin disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans. The treatment with BU-specific antibiotics is initiated after clinical suspicion based on WHO diagnostic criteria. In this study we evaluated the WHO diagnostic guidelines for BU and how these criteria could be improved. A total of 224 patients presenting with skin lesions were recruited in two BU treatment centers in southern Benin between March 2012 and March 2015. Most of the clinical and epidemiological WHO criteria were associated with a confirmed BU diagnosis although lesions on the lower limbs were rather associated with a negative PCR result. Among the additional characteristics studied, the characteristic smell of BU was most strongly associated with a positive PCR result. The WHO diagnostic criteria could therefore be improved upon by discriminating between lesions on the upper and lower limbs and by including lesion size and the characteristic smell recognized by experienced clinicians. The volatiles responsible for this smell could serve as a Point-of-Care diagnostic test, useful for non-invasive confirmation during active case-finding activities, and for training of clinicians.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilbert Adjimon Ayelo & Ghislain Emmanuel Sopoh & Jean-Gabin Houezo & René Fiodessihoue & Dissou Affolabi & Ange Dodji Dossou & Yves Thierry Barogui & Akpeedje Anita Carolle Wadagni & Didier Codjo Ago, 2018. "Improving clinical and epidemiological predictors of Buruli ulcer," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006713
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0006713
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0006713&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.