Author
Listed:
- Valeska Albuquerque Francesconi
- Fabio Francesconi
- Rajendranath Ramasawmy
- Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero
- Maria das Graças Costa Alecrim
Abstract
Background: The treatment of Leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis is based on a weak strength of evidence from very few clinical trials and some case series reports. Current treatment guidelines recommend pentamidine isethionate or meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) as the first-line choices. Both are parenteral drugs with a low therapeutic indexes leading to a high risk of undesired effects. Imidazole derivatives interfere with the production of leishmanial ergosterol, an essential component of their membrane structure. One drug that has been studied in different clinical presentations of Leishmania is fluconazole, a hydrophilic bis-triazole, which is easily absorbed through the oral route with a low toxicity profile and is considered safe for children. This drug is readily available in poor countries with a reasonable cost making it a potential option for treating leishmaniasis. Methods and findings: An adaptive nonrandomized clinical trial with sequential groups with dose escalation of oral fluconazole was designed to treat adult men with localized cutaneous leishmaniasis (LCL) in Manaus, Brazil. Eligible participants were patients with LCL with confirmed Leishmania guyanensis infection. Results: Twenty adult male patients were treated with 450 mg of fluconazole daily for 30 days. One patient (5%) was cured within 30 days of treatment. Of the 19 failures (95%), 13 developed a worsening of ulcers and six evolved lymphatic spreading of the disease. Planned dose escalation was suspended after the disappointing failure rate during the first stage of the trial. Conclusion/Significance: Oral fluconazole, at the dose of 450mg per day, was not efficacious against LCL caused by Leishmania guyanensis in adult men. Trial registration: Brazilian Clinical Trial Registration (ReBec)—RBR-8w292w; UTN number—1158-2421 Author summary: The main agent causing localized cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Guianan Ecoregion Complex, a region that covers Guiana, Suriname, French Guiana, the southern portion of Venezuela and the northern portion of the Amazon Basin, is Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis. The current treatment regimens for treating this parasite follow a weak strength of recommendation based on a low-quality evidence. All the drugs used are parenteral drugs with low therapeutic indexes and inadequate cure rates. Azoles are drugs that interfere with the production of leishmanial ergosterol and have been studied in other Leishmania species with promising results. Fluconazole is a hydrophilic bis-triazole that accumulates rapidly and extensively in the skin with a low toxicity profile. It is considered safe for children. Oral fluconazole is readily available and has a reasonable cost. In this work, we estimated the efficacy of fluconazole in treating localized cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. guyanensis in Manaus. The study had to be stopped due to the disappointing results, with only a 5% cure rate. Among the failures, 55% developed a marked worsening of their ulcers and 55% of those patients had lymphatic dissemination of the infection. In conclusion, fluconazole at the dose of 450mg per day is not efficacious in treating localized cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. guyanensis.
Suggested Citation
Valeska Albuquerque Francesconi & Fabio Francesconi & Rajendranath Ramasawmy & Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero & Maria das Graças Costa Alecrim, 2018.
"Failure of fluconazole in treating cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania guyanensis in the Brazilian Amazon: An open, nonrandomized phase 2 trial,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006225
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006225
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0006225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.