IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0005944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The rationale and cost-effectiveness of a confirmatory mapping tool for lymphatic filariasis: Examples from Ethiopia and Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine M Gass
  • Heven Sime
  • Upendo J Mwingira
  • Andreas Nshala
  • Maria Chikawe
  • Sonia Pelletreau
  • Kira A Barbre
  • Michael S Deming
  • Maria P Rebollo

Abstract

Endemicity mapping is required to determining whether a district requires mass drug administration (MDA). Current guidelines for mapping LF require that two sites be selected per district and within each site a convenience sample of 100 adults be tested for antigenemia or microfilaremia. One or more confirmed positive tests in either site is interpreted as an indicator of potential transmission, prompting MDA at the district-level. While this mapping strategy has worked well in high-prevalence settings, imperfect diagnostics and the transmission potential of a single positive adult have raised concerns about the strategy’s use in low-prevalence settings. In response to these limitations, a statistically rigorous confirmatory mapping strategy was designed as a complement to the current strategy when LF endemicity is uncertain. Under the new strategy, schools are selected by either systematic or cluster sampling, depending on population size, and within each selected school, children 9–14 years are sampled systematically. All selected children are tested and the number of positive results is compared against a critical value to determine, with known probabilities of error, whether the average prevalence of LF infection is likely below a threshold of 2%. This confirmatory mapping strategy was applied to 45 districts in Ethiopia and 10 in Tanzania, where initial mapping results were considered uncertain. In 42 Ethiopian districts, and all 10 of the Tanzanian districts, the number of antigenemic children was below the critical cutoff, suggesting that these districts do not require MDA. Only three Ethiopian districts exceeded the critical cutoff of positive results. Whereas the current World Health Organization guidelines would have recommended MDA in all 55 districts, the present results suggest that only three of these districts requires MDA. By avoiding unnecessary MDA in 52 districts, the confirmatory mapping strategy is estimated to have saved a total of $9,293,219.Author summary: Mapping is used by lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs to determine if mass drug administration (MDA) is required. The current mapping approach, designed to be simple and practical, has worked well in high-prevalence settings but concerns about its reliability in low-prevalence settings have been raised. To address these concerns, a confirmatory mapping strategy was developed that utilizes probability-based sampling of school attending children to determine if the prevalence of LF antigenemia is below a 2% threshold. The confirmatory mapping strategy was implemented in 45 districts in Ethiopia and 10 in Tanzania where the need for MDA was uncertain. In 52 of the 55 districts, the number of LF antigen-positive children identified by the confirmatory mapping strategy was below the predetermined threshold and MDA was deemed unnecessary, while in three districts the number of positive children exceeded the threshold, suggesting that MDA is required. The use of this mapping strategy, to confirm whether MDA is required, is estimated to have saved the Ethiopian and Tanzanian programs $9,293,219 by avoiding unnecessary MDA in 52 districts.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine M Gass & Heven Sime & Upendo J Mwingira & Andreas Nshala & Maria Chikawe & Sonia Pelletreau & Kira A Barbre & Michael S Deming & Maria P Rebollo, 2017. "The rationale and cost-effectiveness of a confirmatory mapping tool for lymphatic filariasis: Examples from Ethiopia and Tanzania," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0005944
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0005944
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0005944&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0005944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.