IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0005899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effectiveness of a national enterovirus 71 vaccination program in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjun Wang
  • Jianwen Song
  • Jingjing Wang
  • Yaping Li
  • Huiling Deng
  • Mei Li
  • Ning Gao
  • Song Zhai
  • Shuangsuo Dang
  • Xin Zhang
  • Xiaoli Jia

Abstract

Background and aims: Enterovirus 71 (EV71) has caused great morbidity, mortality, and use of health service in children younger than five years in China. Vaccines against EV71 have been proved effective and safe by recent phase 3 trials and are now available in China. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health impact and cost-effectiveness of a national EV71 vaccination program in China. Methods: Using Microsoft Excel, a decision model was built to calculate the net clinical and economic outcomes of EV71 vaccination compared with no EV71 vaccination in a birth cohort of 1,000,000 Chinese children followed for five years. Model parameters came from published epidemiology, clinical and cost data. Results: In the base-case, vaccination would annually avert 37,872 cases of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), 2,629 herpangina cases, 72,900 outpatient visits, 6,363 admissions to hospital, 29 deaths, and 945 disability adjusted life years. The break-even price of the vaccine was $5.2/dose. When the price was less than $8.3 or $14.6/dose, the vaccination program would be highly cost-effective or cost-effective, respectively (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio less than or between one to three times China GDP per capita, respectively). In one-way sensitivity analyses, the HFMD incidence was the only influential parameter at the price of $5/dose. Conclusions: Within the price range of current routine vaccines paid by the government, a national EV71 vaccination program would be cost-saving or highly cost-effective to prevent EV71 related morbidity, mortality, and use of health service among children younger than five years in China. Policy makers should consider including EV71 vaccination as part of China’s routine childhood immunization schedule. Author summary: Enterovirus 71 (EV71) has caused great morbidity, mortality, and use of health service in children younger than five years in China. Recently, effective and safe vaccines against EV71 have been approved. Whether EV71 vaccination should be included as part of China’s routine childhood immunization schedule is unknown. In this study, we built a decision model to evaluate the health impact and cost-effectiveness of a national EV71 vaccination program in China. We find that vaccination would annually avert 567,500 cases of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), 40,000 herpangina cases, 1,093,500 outpatient visits, 95,500 admissions to hospital, 435 deaths, and 14,000 disability adjusted life years based on the current Chinese birth cohort size. The break-even price of the vaccine was $5.2/dose. Within the price range of current routine vaccines paid by the government, a national EV71 vaccination program would be cost-saving or highly cost-effective. Policy makers should consider including EV71 vaccination as part of China’s routine childhood immunization schedule.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjun Wang & Jianwen Song & Jingjing Wang & Yaping Li & Huiling Deng & Mei Li & Ning Gao & Song Zhai & Shuangsuo Dang & Xin Zhang & Xiaoli Jia, 2017. "Cost-effectiveness of a national enterovirus 71 vaccination program in China," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0005899
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0005899
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0005899&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0005899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.