IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0005633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First evidence of lymphatic filariasis transmission interruption in Cameroon: Progress towards elimination

Author

Listed:
  • Hugues C Nana-Djeunga
  • Magellan Tchouakui
  • Guy R Njitchouang
  • Jules B Tchatchueng-Mbougua
  • Philippe Nwane
  • André Domche
  • Jean Bopda
  • Stève Mbickmen-Tchana
  • Julie Akame
  • Ann Tarini
  • Emilienne Epée
  • Benjamin D Biholong
  • Yaobi Zhang
  • Jean J Tougoue
  • Achille Kabore
  • Flobert Njiokou
  • Joseph Kamgno

Abstract

Background: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is among the 10 neglected tropical diseases targeted for control or elimination by 2020. For LF elimination, the World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed a comprehensive strategy including (i) interruption of LF transmission through large-scale annual treatment (or mass drug administration (MDA)) of all eligible individuals in endemic areas, and (ii) alleviation of LF-associated suffering through morbidity management and disability prevention. In Cameroon, once-yearly mass administration of ivermectin and albendazole has been implemented since 2008. The aim of this study was to assess progress towards the elimination goal, looking specifically at the impact of six rounds of MDA on LF transmission in northern Cameroon. Methodology: The study was conducted in the North and Far North Regions of Cameroon. Five health districts that successfully completed six rounds of MDA (defined as achieving a treatment coverage ≥ 65% each year) and reported no positive results for Wuchereria bancrofti microfilariaemia during routine surveys following the fifth MDA were grouped into three evaluation units (EU) according to WHO criteria. LF transmission was assessed through a community-based transmission assessment survey (TAS) using an immunochromatographic test (ICT) for the detection of circulating filarial antigen (CFA) in children aged 5–8 years old. Principal findings: A total of 5292 children (male/female ratio 1.04) aged 5–8 years old were examined in 97 communities. Positive CFA results were observed in 2, 8 and 11 cases, with a CFA prevalence of 0.13% (95% CI: 0.04–0.46) in EU#1, 0.57% (95% CI: 0.32–1.02) in EU#2, and 0.45% (95% CI: 0.23–0.89) in EU#3. Conclusion/Significance: The positive CFA cases were below WHO defined critical cut-off thresholds for stopping treatment and suggest that transmission can no longer be sustained. Post-MDA surveillance activities should be organized to evaluate whether recrudescence can occur. Author summary: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) affects more than 120 million people worldwide, and is considered the second leading cause of permanent and long-term disability. In response to the important burden of this disease, the World Health Organization (WHO) elaborated a strategic plan to eliminate LF as a public health problem through annual preventive chemotherapy (PC), repeated for at least six years, and reaching at least 65% of the population at risk. To date, about 5.63 billion cumulative treatments have been delivered since 2000, and more than 300 million people no longer require PC thanks to successful implementation of the WHO strategy. In Cameroon, PC for LF has been implemented since 2008. The aim of this study was to assess whether the transmission of LF has been interrupted. Cross-sectional surveys were conducted in three evaluation units (EU) in northern Cameroon. The LF prevalence observed in each of these EU was lower than the threshold of infection below which transmission is likely no longer sustainable, suggesting that the transmission of LF has been interrupted in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugues C Nana-Djeunga & Magellan Tchouakui & Guy R Njitchouang & Jules B Tchatchueng-Mbougua & Philippe Nwane & André Domche & Jean Bopda & Stève Mbickmen-Tchana & Julie Akame & Ann Tarini & Emilienne, 2017. "First evidence of lymphatic filariasis transmission interruption in Cameroon: Progress towards elimination," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0005633
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0005633
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0005633&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0005633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.