Author
Listed:
- Tomoyuki Yamaguchi
- Kazumasa Yokoyama
- Chie Nakajima
- Yasuhiko Suzuki
Abstract
Background: Fluoroquinolones are a class of antibacterial agents used for leprosy treatment. Some new fluoroquinolones have been attracting interest due to their remarkable potency that is reportedly better than that of ofloxacin, the fluoroquinolone currently recommended for treatment of leprosy. For example, DC-159a, a recently developed 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone, has been found to be highly potent against various bacterial species. Nonetheless, the efficacy of DC-159a against Mycobacterium leprae is yet to be examined. Methodology/Principal Findings: To gather data that can support highly effective fluoroquinolones as candidates for new remedies for leprosy treatment, we conducted in vitro assays to assess and compare the inhibitory activities of DC-159a and two fluoroquinolones that are already known to be more effective against M. leprae than ofloxacin. The fluoroquinolone-inhibited DNA supercoiling assay using recombinant DNA gyrases of wild type and ofloxacin-resistant M. leprae revealed that inhibitory activities of DC-159a and sitafloxacin were at most 9.8- and 11.9-fold higher than moxifloxacin. Also the fluoroquinolone–mediated cleavage assay showed that potencies of those drugs were at most 13.5- and 9.8-fold higher than moxifloxacin. In addition, these two drugs retained their inhibitory activities even against DNA gyrases of ofloxacin-resistant M. leprae. Conclusions/Significance: The results indicated that DC-159a and sitafloxacin are more effective against wild type and mutant M. leprae DNA gyrases than moxifloxacin, suggesting that these antibacterial drugs can be good candidates that may supersede current fluoroquinolone remedies. DC-159a in particular is very promising because it is classified in a subgroup of fluoroquinolones that is known to be less likely to cause adverse effects. Our results implied that DC-159a is well worth further investigation to ascertain its in vivo effectiveness and clinical safety for humans. Author Summary: Leprosy is now recognized as a disease curable by chemotherapy. Although the number of leprosy cases has dramatically decreased as a result of multidrug therapy, there are still more than 210,000 new cases reported worldwide every year. Recurrence is a major concern in the control of leprosy. Relapses are usually considered to result from therapeutic failure due to inadequate or incomplete treatment. Thus, patient compliance with the planned course of medication is an important factor in the treatment outcome because multidrug therapy can take as long as up to 12 months. To improve patient compliance, it is imperative to develop and apply more potent drugs that can exert effect in a shorter period of treatment. In this study, focusing on the fluoroquinolone class of antimicrobials, we examined three powerful derivatives including newly developed DC-159a for their potencies against Mycobacterium leprae, the causative agent of leprosy. Our results indicate that the activity of DC-159a is sufficiently high and expected to surpass that of the currently used fluoroquinolone. This is the first strong evidence of the potential of this drug as a promising candidate for new leprosy remedies.
Suggested Citation
Tomoyuki Yamaguchi & Kazumasa Yokoyama & Chie Nakajima & Yasuhiko Suzuki, 2016.
"DC-159a Shows Inhibitory Activity against DNA Gyrases of Mycobacterium leprae,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0005013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005013
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0005013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.