IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0004917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Burden of Lymphedema Due to Lymphatic Filariasis in 2005 in Khurda District, Odisha State, India

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Walsh
  • Kristen Little
  • Ryan Wiegand
  • Jonathan Rout
  • LeAnne M Fox

Abstract

Background: Over 1.1 billion people worldwide are at risk for lymphatic filariasis (LF), and the global burden of LF-associated lymphedema is estimated at 16 million affected people, yet country-specific estimates are poor. Methodology/Principal Findings: A house-to-house morbidity census was conducted to assess the burden and severity of lymphedema in a population of 1,298,576 persons living in the LF-endemic district of Khurda in Odisha State, India. The burden of lymphedema in Khurda is widespread geographically, and 1.3% (17,036) of the total population report lymphedema. 51.3% of the patients reporting lymphedema were female, mean age 49.4 years (1–99). Early lymphedema (Dreyer stages 1 & 2) was reported in two-thirds of the patients. Poisson regression analysis was conducted in order to determine risk factors for advanced lymphedema (Dreyer stages 4–7). Increasing age was significantly associated with advanced lymphedema, and persons 70 years and older had a prevalence three times greater than individuals ages 15–29 (aPR: 3.21, 95% CI 2.45, 4.21). The number of adenolymphangitis (ADL) episodes reported in the previous year was also significantly associated with advanced lymphedema (aPR 4.65, 95% CI 2.97–7.30). This analysis is one of the first to look at potential risk factors for advanced lymphedema using morbidity census data from an entire district in Odisha State, India. Significance: These data highlight the magnitude of lymphedema in LF-endemic areas and emphasize the need to develop robust estimates of numbers of individuals with lymphedema in order to identify the extent of lymphedema management services needed in these regions. Author Summary: The results presented in this article demonstrate the need to assess the clinical disease burden due to lymphatic filariasis (LF) in areas of the world where this disease occurs. There are effective strategies that can be implemented to reduce the suffering and morbidity associated with chronic filarial infections. These include lymphedema management programs that teach basic hygiene to decrease limb infections that contribute to lymphedema progression. These interventions should be implemented on a broader scale and can be integrated with other chronic disease prevention programs at subnational and national levels. However, knowledge of the scale and distribution of individuals suffering with lymphedema in countries with LF is required to decide where and how these health services should be implemented. Countries with LF are encouraged to conduct burden assessments to decide how best to implement lymphedema management programs. Providing health services for those with lymphedema is an important component of reducing LF as a public health problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Walsh & Kristen Little & Ryan Wiegand & Jonathan Rout & LeAnne M Fox, 2016. "Evaluating the Burden of Lymphedema Due to Lymphatic Filariasis in 2005 in Khurda District, Odisha State, India," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0004917
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0004917
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0004917&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0004917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.