IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0004504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Have You Heard of Schistosomiasis? Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices in Nampula Province, Mozambique

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Rassi
  • Dan Kajungu
  • Sandrine Martin
  • Jorge Arroz
  • Jamie Tallant
  • Celine Zegers de Beyl
  • Helen Counihan
  • James N Newell
  • Anna Phillips
  • Jane Whitton
  • Artur Manuel Muloliwa
  • Kirstie Graham

Abstract

Background: Schistosomiasis is a parasitic disease which affects almost 300 million people worldwide each year. It is highly endemic in Mozambique. Prevention and control of schistosomiasis relies mainly on mass drug administration (MDA), as well as adoption of basic sanitation practices. Individual and community perceptions of schistosomiasis are likely to have a significant effect on prevention and control efforts. In order to establish a baseline to evaluate a community engagement intervention with a focus on schistosomiasis, a survey to determine knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to the disease was conducted. Methodology/Principal Findings: A representative cross-sectional household survey was carried out in four districts of Nampula province, Mozambique. Interviews were conducted in a total of 791 households, using a structured questionnaire. While awareness of schistosomiasis was high (91%), correct knowledge of how it is acquired (18%), transmitted (26%) and prevented (13%) was low among those who had heard of the disease. Misconceptions, such as the belief that schistosomiasis is transmitted through sexual contact (27%), were common. Only about a third of those who were aware of the disease stated that they practiced a protective behaviour and only a minority of those (39%) reported an effective behaviour. Despite several rounds of MDA for schistosomiasis in the recent past, only a small minority of households with children reported that at least one of them had received a drug to treat the disease (9%). Conclusion/Significance: Poor knowledge of the causes of schistosomiasis and how to prevent it, coupled with persisting misconceptions, continue to pose barriers to effective disease prevention and control. To achieve high levels of uptake of MDA and adoption of protective behaviours, it will be essential to engage individuals and communities, improving their understanding of the causes and symptoms of schistosomiasis, recommended prevention mechanisms and the rationale behind MDA. Author Summary: Schistosomiasis is one of the 17 ‘neglected tropical diseases’ as classified by the World Health Organization. It is a parasitic disease of poverty that affects around 300 million people each year, causing chronic ill-health and severe morbidity. The disease, which is spread through contact with freshwater contaminated with the parasite, can be prevented and controlled in two ways: by distributing drugs on a mass scale (“mass drug administration”) and by changing hygiene and sanitation practices to reduce contact with the parasite. A prerequisite for both strategies is that communities have an understanding of the disease and what solutions are available for its prevention and control.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Rassi & Dan Kajungu & Sandrine Martin & Jorge Arroz & Jamie Tallant & Celine Zegers de Beyl & Helen Counihan & James N Newell & Anna Phillips & Jane Whitton & Artur Manuel Muloliwa & Kirstie, 2016. "Have You Heard of Schistosomiasis? Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices in Nampula Province, Mozambique," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0004504
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0004504
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0004504&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0004504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.