IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0001031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interruption and Defaulting of Multidrug Therapy against Leprosy: Population-Based Study in Brazil's Savannah Region

Author

Listed:
  • Jorg Heukelbach
  • Olga André Chichava
  • Alexcian Rodrigues de Oliveira
  • Kathrin Häfner
  • Friederike Walther
  • Carlos Henrique Morais de Alencar
  • Alberto Novaes Ramos Jr.
  • Adriana Cavalcante Ferreira
  • Liana Ariza

Abstract

Background: Low adherence to multidrug therapy against leprosy (MDT) is still an important obstacle of disease control, and may lead to remaining sources of infection, incomplete cure, irreversible complications, and multidrug resistance. Methodology/Principal Finding: We performed a population-based study in 78 municipalities in Tocantins State, central Brazil, and applied structured questionnaires on leprosy-affected individuals. We used two outcomes for assessment of risk factors: defaulting (not presenting to health care center for supervised treatment for >12 months); and interruption of MDT. In total, 28/936 (3.0%) patients defaulted, and 147/806 (18.2%) interrupted MDT. Defaulting was significantly associated with: low number of rooms per household (OR = 3.43; 0.98–9.69; p = 0.03); moving to another residence after diagnosis (OR = 2.90; 0.95–5.28; p = 0.04); and low family income (OR = 2.42; 1.02–5.63: p = 0.04). Interruption of treatment was associated with: low number of rooms per household (OR = 1.95; 0.98–3.70; p = 0.04); difficulty in swallowing MDT drugs (OR = 1.66; 1.03–2.63; p = 0.02); temporal non-availability of MDT at the health center (OR = 1.67; 1.11–2.46; p = 0.01); and moving to another residence (OR = 1.58; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–2.40; p = 0.03). Logistic regression identified temporal non-availability of MDT as an independent risk factor for treatment interruption (adjusted OR = 1.56; 1.05–2.33; p = 0.03), and residence size as a protective factor (adjusted OR = 0.89 per additional number of rooms; 0.80–0.99; p = 0.03). Residence size was also independently associated with defaulting (adjusted OR = 0.67; 0.52–0.88; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Defaulting and interruption of MDT are associated with some poverty-related variables such as family income, household size, and migration. Intermittent problems of drug supply need to be resolved, mainly on the municipality level. MDT producers should consider oral drug formulations that may be more easily accepted by patients. Thus, an integrated approach is needed for further improving control, focusing on vulnerable population groups and the local health system. Author Summary: Leprosy is still a public health problem in Brazil, and low adherence to multidrug therapy against leprosy (MDT) is an important obstacle of disease control. This may lead to remaining sources of infection, incomplete cure, complications, and multidrug resistance. We performed a study in 78 municipalities in central Brazil, and interviewed leprosy-affected individuals. In total, 3% of patients defaulted, and 18.2% interrupted MDT. Risk factors for interruption of treatment include: reduced number of rooms per household (OR = 1.95; p = 0.04); difficulty in swallowing MDT drugs (OR = 1.66; p = 0.02); temporal non-availability of MDT drugs at health center (OR = 1.67; p = 0.01); and moving residence after diagnosis (OR = 1.58; p = 0.03). Defaulting MDT was significantly associated with: reduced number of rooms per household (OR = 3.43; p = 0.03); moving to another residence (OR = 2.90; p = 0.04); and low family income (OR = 2.42; p = 0.04). Our study shows that defaulting and interruption of MDT against leprosy are associated with some poverty-related variables such as family income, household size, and migration. Intermittent problems of drug supply need to be resolved, mainly on the municipality level. MDT producers should consider drug formulations that are more easily accepted by patients. An integrated approach is needed for further improving control, focusing on most vulnerable population groups and the local health system.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorg Heukelbach & Olga André Chichava & Alexcian Rodrigues de Oliveira & Kathrin Häfner & Friederike Walther & Carlos Henrique Morais de Alencar & Alberto Novaes Ramos Jr. & Adriana Cavalcante Ferreir, 2011. "Interruption and Defaulting of Multidrug Therapy against Leprosy: Population-Based Study in Brazil's Savannah Region," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-9, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0001031
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0001031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0001031&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaio Vinicius Freitas de Andrade & Joilda Silva Nery & Julia Moreira Pescarini & Anna Ramond & Carlos Antônio de Souza Teles Santos & Maria Yury Ichihara & Maria Lucia Fernandes Penna & Elizabeth B. B, 2019. "Geographic and socioeconomic factors associated with leprosy treatment default: An analysis from the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0001031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.