IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0000460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Global Burden of Trachoma: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew J Burton
  • David C W Mabey

Abstract

Trachoma is the commonest infectious cause of blindness worldwide. Recurrent infection of the ocular surface by Chlamydia trachomatis, the causative agent, leads to inturning of the eyelashes (trichiasis) and blinding corneal opacification. Trachoma is endemic in more than 50 countries. It is currently estimated that there are about 1.3 million people blind from the disease and a further 8.2 million have trichiasis. Several estimates for the burden of disease from trachoma have been made, giving quite variable results. The variation is partly because different prevalence data have been used and partly because different sequelae have been included. The most recent estimate from the WHO placed it at around 1.3 million Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). A key issue in producing a reliable estimate of the global burden of trachoma is the limited amount of reliable survey data from endemic regions.Author Summary: This review examines the various attempts to estimate the burden of disease from trachoma, the commonest infectious cause of blindness worldwide. Reports vary considerably because of differences in methodology and changing estimates of the number of people affected. Currently about 1.3 million are blind from trachoma and it causes about 1.3 million Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). The limited amount of survey data available from endemic regions remains a problem in generating accurate estimates. The effect of the disease may be underestimated as some of the disabling sequelae are not included in the calculation.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew J Burton & David C W Mabey, 2009. "The Global Burden of Trachoma: A Review," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-7, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0000460
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0000460
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0000460&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yvonne Pannekoek & Veerle Dickx & Delphine S A Beeckman & Keith A Jolley & Wendy C Keijzers & Evangelia Vretou & Martin C J Maiden & Daisy Vanrompay & Arie van der Ende, 2010. "Multi Locus Sequence Typing of Chlamydia Reveals an Association between Chlamydia psittaci Genotypes and Host Species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Matthew C Kim & Kazunori Okada & Alexander M Ryner & Abdou Amza & Zerihun Tadesse & Sun Y Cotter & Bruce D Gaynor & Jeremy D Keenan & Thomas M Lietman & Travis C Porco, 2019. "Sensitivity and specificity of computer vision classification of eyelid photographs for programmatic trachoma assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0000460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.