IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1002981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cardiometabolic disease costs associated with suboptimal diet in the United States: A cost analysis based on a microsimulation model

Author

Listed:
  • Thiago Veiga Jardim
  • Dariush Mozaffarian
  • Shafika Abrahams-Gessel
  • Stephen Sy
  • Yujin Lee
  • Junxiu Liu
  • Yue Huang
  • Colin Rehm
  • Parke Wilde
  • Renata Micha
  • Thomas A Gaziano

Abstract

Background: Poor diet is a leading risk factor for cardiometabolic disease (CMD) in the United States, but its economic costs are unknown. We sought to estimate the cost associated with suboptimal diet in the US. Methods and findings: A validated microsimulation model (Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model for Risk, Events, Detection, Interventions, Costs, and Trends [CVD PREDICT]) was used to estimate annual cardiovascular disease (fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, angina, and stroke) and type 2 diabetes costs associated with suboptimal intake of 10 food groups (fruits, vegetables, nuts/seeds, whole grains, unprocessed red meats, processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages, polyunsaturated fats, seafood omega-3 fats, sodium). A representative US population sample of individuals aged 35–85 years was created using weighted sampling from National Health And Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2009–2012 cycles. Estimates were stratified by cost type (acute, chronic, drug), sex, age, race, education, BMI, and health insurance. Annual diet-related CMD costs were $301/person (95% CI $287–$316). This translates to $50.4 billion in CMD costs (18.2% of total) for the whole population, of which 84.3% are attributed to acute care ($42.6 billion). The largest annual per capita costs are attributed to low consumption of nuts/seeds ($81; 95% CI $74–$86) and seafood omega-3 fats ($76; 95% CI $70–$83), and the lowest are attributed to high consumption of red meat ($3; 95% CI $2.8–$3.5) and polyunsaturated fats ($20; 95% CI $19–$22). Individual costs are highest for men ($380), those aged ≥65 years ($408), blacks ($320), the less educated ($392), and those with Medicare ($481) or dual-eligible ($536) insurance coverage. A limitation of our study is that dietary intake data were assessed from 24-hour dietary recall, which may not fully capture a diet over a person's life span and is subject to measurement errors. Conclusions: Suboptimal diet of 10 dietary factors accounts for 18.2% of all ischemic heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes costs in the US, highlighting that timely implementation of diet policies could address these health and economic burdens. In a microsimulation model-based cost analysis, Gaziano and colleagues investigate the estimated cardiometabolic disease costs in the United States associated with suboptimal diet.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Thiago Veiga Jardim & Dariush Mozaffarian & Shafika Abrahams-Gessel & Stephen Sy & Yujin Lee & Junxiu Liu & Yue Huang & Colin Rehm & Parke Wilde & Renata Micha & Thomas A Gaziano, 2019. "Cardiometabolic disease costs associated with suboptimal diet in the United States: A cost analysis based on a microsimulation model," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002981
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002981
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002981&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kara A. Livingston & Kelly J. Freeman & Susan M. Friedman & Ron W. Stout & Liana S. Lianov & David Drozek & Jamie Shallow & Dexter Shurney & Padmaja M. Patel & Thomas M. Campbell & Kaitlyn R. Pauly & , 2021. "Lifestyle Medicine and Economics: A Proposal for Research Priorities Informed by a Case Series of Disease Reversal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Rachel Brown & Lara Ware & Siew Ling Tey, 2022. "Effects of Hazelnut Consumption on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Acceptance: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-50, March.
    3. Bailey Houghtaling & Matthew Greene & Kaustubh V. Parab & Chelsea R. Singleton, 2022. "Improving Fruit and Vegetable Accessibility, Purchasing, and Consumption to Advance Nutrition Security and Health Equity in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Nadine Budd Nugent & Carmen Byker Shanks & Hilary K. Seligman & Hollyanne Fricke & Courtney A. Parks & Sarah Stotz & Amy L. Yaroch, 2021. "Accelerating Evaluation of Financial Incentives for Fruits and Vegetables: A Case for Shared Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Yuanyuan Zhu & Yan Zhang & Xiaohua Zhu & Yuan Luo & ZhenFa Tu, 2024. "The evolution of animal-based dietary structure has contributed to the increase of healthcare expenditures in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Alyssa J. Moran & Yuxuan Gu & Sasha Clynes & Attia Goheer & Christina A. Roberto & Anne Palmer, 2020. "Associations between Governmental Policies to Improve the Nutritional Quality of Supermarket Purchases and Individual, Retailer, and Community Health Outcomes: An Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.