IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1002784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plasmodium vivax morbidity after radical cure: A cohort study in Central Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Thanh Vinh Pham
  • Hong Van Nguyen
  • Angel Rosas Aguirre
  • Van Van Nguyen
  • Mario A. Cleves
  • Xa Xuan Nguyen
  • Thao Thanh Nguyen
  • Duong Thanh Tran
  • Hung Xuan Le
  • Niel Hens
  • Anna Rosanas-Urgell
  • Umberto D’Alessandro
  • Niko Speybroeck
  • Annette Erhart

Abstract

Background: In Vietnam, the importance of vivax malaria relative to falciparum during the past decade has steadily increased to 50%. This, together with the spread of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum, is a major challenge for malaria elimination. A 2-year prospective cohort study to assess P. vivax morbidity after radical cure treatment and related risk factors was conducted in Central Vietnam. Methods and findings: The study was implemented between April 2009 and December 2011 in four neighboring villages in a remote forested area of Quang Nam province. P. vivax-infected patients were treated radically with chloroquine (CQ; 25 mg/kg over 3 days) and primaquine (PQ; 0.5 mg/kg/day for 10 days) and visited monthly (malaria symptoms and blood sampling) for up to 2 years. Time to first vivax recurrence was estimated by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and risk factors for first and recurrent infections were identified by Cox regression models. Among the 260 P. vivax patients (61% males [159/260]; age range 3–60) recruited, 240 completed the 10-day treatment, 223 entered the second month of follow-up, and 219 were followed for at least 12 months. Most individuals (76.78%, 171/223) had recurrent vivax infections identified by molecular methods (polymerase chain reaction [PCR]); in about half of them (55.61%, 124/223), infection was detected by microscopy, and 84 individuals (37.67%) had symptomatic recurrences. Median time to first recurrence by PCR was 118 days (IQR 59–208). The estimated probability of remaining free of recurrence by month 24 was 20.40% (95% CI [14.42; 27.13]) by PCR, 42.52% (95% CI [35.41; 49.44]) by microscopy, and 60.69% (95% CI [53.51; 67.11]) for symptomatic recurrences. The main risk factor for recurrence (first or recurrent) was prior P. falciparum infection. The main limitations of this study are the age of the results and the absence of a comparator arm, which does not allow estimating the proportion of vivax relapses among recurrent infections. Conclusion: A substantial number of P. vivax recurrences, mainly submicroscopic (SM) and asymptomatic, were observed after high-dose PQ treatment (5.0 mg/kg). Prior P. falciparum infection was an important risk factor for all types of vivax recurrences. Malaria elimination efforts need to address this largely undetected P. vivax transmission by simultaneously tackling the reservoir of P. falciparum and P. vivax infections. In a cohort study in 4 villages in Vietnam, Thanh Vinh Pham and colleagues investigate outcomes 1-2 years following a high dose primaquine regimen to treat P. vivax malaria.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Thanh Vinh Pham & Hong Van Nguyen & Angel Rosas Aguirre & Van Van Nguyen & Mario A. Cleves & Xa Xuan Nguyen & Thao Thanh Nguyen & Duong Thanh Tran & Hung Xuan Le & Niel Hens & Anna Rosanas-Urgell & Um, 2019. "Plasmodium vivax morbidity after radical cure: A cohort study in Central Vietnam," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002784
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002784
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002784&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002784?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.