IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1002499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to azithromycin and ceftriaxone in China: A retrospective study of national surveillance data from 2013 to 2016

Author

Listed:
  • Yue-Ping Yin
  • Yan Han
  • Xiu-Qin Dai
  • He-Ping Zheng
  • Shao-Chun Chen
  • Bang-Yong Zhu
  • Gang Yong
  • Na Zhong
  • Li-Hua Hu
  • Wen-Ling Cao
  • Zhong-Jie Zheng
  • Feng Wang
  • Qi Zhi
  • Xiao-Yu Zhu
  • Xiang-Sheng Chen

Abstract

Background: Gonorrhea remains one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases worldwide. Successful treatment has been hampered by emerging resistance to each of the antibiotics recommended as first-line therapies. We retrospectively analyzed the susceptibility of gonorrhea to azithromycin and ceftriaxone using data from the China Gonococcal Resistance Surveillance Programme (China-GRSP) in order to provide evidence for updating the treatment recommendations in China. Methods and findings: In this study, we included 3,849 isolates collected from patients with a confirmed positive Neisseria gonorrhoeae (N. gonorrhoeae) culture at clinic visits during the period of 1 January 2013 through 31 December 2016 in 7 provinces. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gonorrhea isolates using agar dilution was conducted to determine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Resistance to azithromycin (RTA) was defined as MIC ≥ 1.0 mg/l, and decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone (DSC) was defined as MIC ≥ 0.125 mg/l. The prevalence of isolates with RTA was 18.6% (710/3,827; 95% CI 17.4%–19.8%). The percentage of patients with DSC fluctuated between 9.7% and 12.2% over this period. The overall prevalence of isolates with both RTA and DSC was 2.3% (87/3,827; 95% CI 1.9%–2.8%) and it increased from 1.9% in 2013 to 3.3% in 2016 (chi-squared test for trend, P = 0.03). Study limitations include the retrospective study design and potential biases in the sample, which may overrepresent men with symptomatic infection, coastal residents, and people reporting as heterosexual. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first national study on susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae to azithromycin and ceftriaxone in China. Our findings indicate high rates of RTA and DSC from 2013 to 2016. Although dual therapy with azithromycin and ceftriaxone has been recommended by WHO and many countries to treat gonorrhea, reevaluation of this therapy is needed prior to its introduction in China. In an observational study using data from the China Gonococcal Resistance Surveillance Programme, Yueping Yin estimate rates of reduced susceptibility to WHO-recommended antibiotics for Neisseria gonorrhoeae.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Yue-Ping Yin & Yan Han & Xiu-Qin Dai & He-Ping Zheng & Shao-Chun Chen & Bang-Yong Zhu & Gang Yong & Na Zhong & Li-Hua Hu & Wen-Ling Cao & Zhong-Jie Zheng & Feng Wang & Qi Zhi & Xiao-Yu Zhu & Xiang-She, 2018. "Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to azithromycin and ceftriaxone in China: A retrospective study of national surveillance data from 2013 to 2016," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002499
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002499
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002499&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.