IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1002290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First-trimester artemisinin derivatives and quinine treatments and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Africa and Asia: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Dellicour
  • Esperança Sevene
  • Rose McGready
  • Halidou Tinto
  • Dominic Mosha
  • Christine Manyando
  • Stephen Rulisa
  • Meghna Desai
  • Peter Ouma
  • Martina Oneko
  • Anifa Vala
  • Maria Rupérez
  • Eusébio Macete
  • Clara Menéndez
  • Seydou Nakanabo-Diallo
  • Adama Kazienga
  • Innocent Valéa
  • Gregory Calip
  • Orvalho Augusto
  • Blaise Genton
  • Eric M Njunju
  • Kerryn A Moore
  • Umberto d’Alessandro
  • Francois Nosten
  • Feiko ter Kuile
  • Andy Stergachis

Abstract

Background: Animal embryotoxicity data, and the scarcity of safety data in human pregnancies, have prevented artemisinin derivatives from being recommended for malaria treatment in the first trimester except in lifesaving circumstances. We conducted a meta-analysis of prospective observational studies comparing the risk of miscarriage, stillbirth, and major congenital anomaly (primary outcomes) among first-trimester pregnancies treated with artemisinin derivatives versus quinine or no antimalarial treatment. Methods and findings: Electronic databases including Medline, Embase, and Malaria in Pregnancy Library were searched, and investigators contacted. Five studies involving 30,618 pregnancies were included; four from sub-Saharan Africa (n = 6,666 pregnancies, six sites) and one from Thailand (n = 23,952). Antimalarial exposures were ascertained by self-report or active detection and confirmed by prescriptions, clinic cards, and outpatient registers. Cox proportional hazards models, accounting for time under observation and gestational age at enrollment, were used to calculate hazard ratios. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis was used to combine the African studies, and the results were then combined with those from Thailand using aggregated data meta-analysis with a random effects model. Conclusions: Compared to quinine, artemisinin treatment in the first trimester was not associated with an increased risk of miscarriage or stillbirth. While the data are limited, they indicate no difference in the prevalence of major congenital anomalies between treatment groups. The benefits of 3-d artemisinin combination therapy regimens to treat malaria in early pregnancy are likely to outweigh the adverse outcomes of partially treated malaria, which can occur with oral quinine because of the known poor adherence to 7-d regimens. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42015032371 In a meta-analysis using individual patient data from prospective observational studies, Andy Stergachis and colleagues investigate the risk of of miscarriage, stillbirth, and major congenital anomaly among pregnancies that were treated during the first trimester with artemisinin derivatives versus quinine or no antimalarial treatment.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Dellicour & Esperança Sevene & Rose McGready & Halidou Tinto & Dominic Mosha & Christine Manyando & Stephen Rulisa & Meghna Desai & Peter Ouma & Martina Oneko & Anifa Vala & Maria Rupérez & , 2017. "First-trimester artemisinin derivatives and quinine treatments and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Africa and Asia: A meta-analysis of observational studies," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002290
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002290
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002290&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.