IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1001084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ghostwriting Revisited: New Perspectives but Few Solutions in Sight

Author

Listed:
  • The PLoS Medicine Editors

Abstract

The PLoS Medicine editors discuss new perspectives on ghost writing and reflect on the suggested remedies put forth in this month's issue of the journal.

Suggested Citation

  • The PLoS Medicine Editors, 2011. "Ghostwriting Revisited: New Perspectives but Few Solutions in Sight," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-2, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001084
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001084
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001084&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Stern & Trudo Lemmens, 2011. "Legal Remedies for Medical Ghostwriting: Imposing Fraud Liability on Guest Authors of Ghostwritten Articles," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-5, August.
    2. Linda Logdberg, 2011. "Being the Ghost in the Machine: A Medical Ghostwriter's Personal View," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-2, August.
    3. Alastair Matheson, 2011. "How Industry Uses the ICMJE Guidelines to Manipulate Authorship—And How They Should Be Revised," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-5, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ellenberg Susan S., 2011. "Discussion of Alemayehu and Levenstein," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-5, November.
    2. Pedro Parreira & Liliana B. Sousa & Inês A. Marques & Paulo Santos-Costa & Sara Cortez & Filipa Carneiro & Arménio Cruz & Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira, 2020. "Study Protocol for Two-Steps Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial: Pre-Clinical Usability Tests for a New Double-Chamber Syringe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Lana Bošnjak & Ana Marušić, 2012. "Prescribed practices of authorship: review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 751-763, December.
    4. Amrollah Shamsi & Rafaela Carolina Silva & Ting Wang & N. Vasantha Raju & Karen Santos-d’Amorim, 2022. "A grey zone for bibliometrics: publications indexed in Web of Science as anonymous," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 5989-6009, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.