IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1000388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimates of Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Europe, 2009–2010: Results of Influenza Monitoring Vaccine Effectiveness in Europe (I-MOVE) Multicentre Case-Control Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Valenciano
  • Esther Kissling
  • Jean-Marie Cohen
  • Beatrix Oroszi
  • Anne-Sophie Barret
  • Caterina Rizzo
  • Baltazar Nunes
  • Daniela Pitigoi
  • Amparro Larrauri Cámara
  • Anne Mosnier
  • Judith K Horvath
  • Joan O'Donnell
  • Antonino Bella
  • Raquel Guiomar
  • Emilia Lupulescu
  • Camelia Savulescu
  • Bruno C Ciancio
  • Piotr Kramarz
  • Alain Moren

Abstract

Results from a European multicentre case-control study reported by Marta Valenciano and colleagues suggest good protection by the pandemic monovalent H1N1 vaccine against pH1N1 and no effect of the 2009–2010 seasonal influenza vaccine on H1N1.Background: A multicentre case-control study based on sentinel practitioner surveillance networks from seven European countries was undertaken to estimate the effectiveness of 2009–2010 pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccines against medically attended influenza-like illness (ILI) laboratory-confirmed as pandemic influenza A (H1N1) (pH1N1). Methods and Findings: Sentinel practitioners swabbed ILI patients using systematic sampling. We included in the study patients meeting the European ILI case definition with onset of symptoms >14 days after the start of national pandemic vaccination campaigns. We compared pH1N1 cases to influenza laboratory-negative controls. A valid vaccination corresponded to >14 days between receiving a dose of vaccine and symptom onset. We estimated pooled vaccine effectiveness (VE) as 1 minus the odds ratio with the study site as a fixed effect. Using logistic regression, we adjusted VE for potential confounding factors (age group, sex, month of onset, chronic diseases and related hospitalizations, smoking history, seasonal influenza vaccinations, practitioner visits in previous year). We conducted a complete case analysis excluding individuals with missing values and a multiple multivariate imputation to estimate missing values. The multivariate imputation (n = 2902) adjusted pandemic VE (PIVE) estimates were 71.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.6–85.5) overall; 78.4% (95% CI 54.4–89.8) in patients

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Valenciano & Esther Kissling & Jean-Marie Cohen & Beatrix Oroszi & Anne-Sophie Barret & Caterina Rizzo & Baltazar Nunes & Daniela Pitigoi & Amparro Larrauri Cámara & Anne Mosnier & Judith K Horv, 2011. "Estimates of Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Europe, 2009–2010: Results of Influenza Monitoring Vaccine Effectiveness in Europe (I-MOVE) Multicentre Case-Control Study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1000388
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000388
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000388&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Camille Pelat & Alessandra Falchi & Fabrice Carrat & Anne Mosnier & Isabelle Bonmarin & Clément Turbelin & Sophie Vaux & Sylvie van der Werf & Jean Marie Cohen & Bruno Lina & Thierry Blanchon & Thomas, 2011. "Field Effectiveness of Pandemic and 2009-2010 Seasonal Vaccines against 2009-2010 A(H1N1) Influenza: Estimations from Surveillance Data in France," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-12, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1000388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.