IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/0040168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Problems in the Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Goodman
  • Sander Greenland

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Goodman & Sander Greenland, 2007. "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Problems in the Analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-1, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:0040168
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jesper W. Schneider, 2015. "Null hypothesis significance tests. A mix-up of two different theories: the basis for widespread confusion and numerous misinterpretations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 411-432, January.
    2. Mayo, Deborah & Morey, Richard Donald, 2017. "A Poor Prognosis for the Diagnostic Screening Critique of Statistical Tests," OSF Preprints ps38b, Center for Open Science.
    3. Harlan Campbell & Paul Gustafson, 2019. "The World of Research Has Gone Berserk: Modeling the Consequences of Requiring “Greater Statistical Stringency” for Scientific Publication," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(S1), pages 358-373, March.
    4. Lars Ole Schwen & Sabrina Rueschenbaum, 2018. "Ten quick tips for getting the most scientific value out of numerical data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Andrew Y. Chen & Tom Zimmermann, 2022. "Publication Bias in Asset Pricing Research," Papers 2209.13623, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:0040168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.