Author
Listed:
- Emmanuela Gakidou
- Effy Vayena
Abstract
Background: The widespread increase in the use of contraception, due to multiple factors including improved access to modern contraception, is one of the most dramatic social transformations of the past fifty years. This study explores whether the global progress in the use of modern contraceptives has also benefited the poorest. Methods and Findings: Demographic and Health Surveys from 55 developing countries were analyzed using wealth indices that allow the identification of the absolute poor within each country. This article explores the macro level determinants of the differences in the use of modern contraceptives between the poor and the national averages of several countries. Despite increases in national averages, use of modern contraception by the absolute poor remains low. South and Southeast Asia have relatively high rates of modern contraception in the absolute poor, on average 17% higher than in Latin America. Over time the gaps in use persist and are increasing. Latin America exhibits significantly larger gaps in use between the poor and the averages, while gaps in sub-Saharan Africa are on average smaller by 15.8% and in Southeast Asia by 11.6%. Conclusions: The secular trend of increasing rates of modern contraceptive use has not resulted in a decrease of the gap in use for those living in absolute poverty. Countries with large economic inequalities also exhibit large inequalities in modern contraceptive use. In addition to macro level factors that influence contraceptive use, such as economic development and provision of reproductive health services, there are strong regional variations, with sub-Saharan Africa exhibiting the lowest national rates of use, South and Southeast Asia the highest use among the poor, and Latin America the largest inequalities in use. Analysis of demographic and health surveys from 55 developing countries confirms the increasing use of modern contraceptives, but their use by people living in absolute poverty lags considerably behind. Background.: Access to safe and effective methods of contraception is seen by many to be a basic human right. Contraception plays an important role in improving women's health (by reducing the risks that would otherwise accompany unwanted births), as well as the social and financial situation of women and their families. However, despite a steady increase in contraceptive use worldwide over the past few decades, the World Health Organization says there is still a significant unmet need for birth control. Very many women worldwide, probably around 123 million, would like to limit the number of children that they might have but, despite this, they are not using contraception. There are probably many factors responsible for this unmet need, including the availability of health services, a woman's level of education, her social and financial situation, and cultural factors. Why Was This Study Done?: Although it is clear that use of contraception has been increasing worldwide over the past few decades, particularly in developing countries, it is not clear whether the poorest people in each country have also benefited from this trend. Given that contraception has important effects on health and on the financial and social circumstances of a family, it is important to find out whether there are any differences in contraceptive use between the poorest and richer members of society. What Did the Researchers Do and Find?: This research project was based on data collected by a survey oganization about various aspects of the health, social, and economic status of households worldwide. Over 100 surveys conducted between 1985 and 2003 were used from the publicly available survey database. The researchers then classified each household for which there was survey information as being in the poorest 20% of households or not, worldwide. Importantly, this categorization reflects whether the household was in the “absolute poor” worldwide, not just the poorest for their respective country. Since information about household income was not directly available from the surveys, the researchers had to use an approach based on ownership of consumer goods and services (referred to as “asset-based wealth measures”). The researchers then looked at trends in contraceptive use amongst the poorest households, and examined whether contraceptive use was linked to other factors, such as level of education and average income. What Do These Findings Mean?: This study shows that although contraception use is increasing over time, its use by poor people is low. The gap in use of contraception between poor people and “average” people also seems to be increasing over time and is wider in richer countries. The reasons behind these findings are not clear, but the data suggest that nations and international health organizations need to focus their attention on providing contraceptive services in a way that will reach people who have very low incomes. Additional Information.: Please access these Web sites via the online version of this summary at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040031.
Suggested Citation
Emmanuela Gakidou & Effy Vayena, 2007.
"Use of Modern Contraception by the Poor Is Falling Behind,"
PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-9, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pmed00:0040031
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040031
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Ranjan Kumar Prusty & Amit Bhanot & Hanimi Reddy & Ranjan Kumar Panda, 2018.
"Trends in Contraceptive Use and Method Mix from Equity Perspective in the Past Two Decades: Evidence from Two East Indian States,"
Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, March.
- Rozemarijn Dereuddre & Bart Van de Putte & Piet Bracke, 2016.
"Ready, Willing, and Able: Contraceptive Use Patterns Across Europe,"
European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 32(4), pages 543-573, October.
- Konte, Maty & Osei Kwadwo, Victor & Zinyemba, Tatenda, 2019.
"Women's political and reproductive health empowerment in Africa: A literature review,"
MERIT Working Papers
2019-044, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
- José G Dias & Isabel Tiago de Oliveira, 2015.
"Multilevel Effects of Wealth on Women's Contraceptive Use in Mozambique,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
- Holger Strulik, 2017.
"Contraception And Development: A Unified Growth Theory,"
International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 58(2), pages 561-584, May.
- Strulik, Holger, 2019.
"Desire And Development,"
Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(7), pages 2717-2747, October.
- Brittany McKinnon & Sam Harper & Spencer Moore, 2011.
"Decomposing income-related inequality in cervical screening in 67 countries,"
International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(2), pages 139-152, April.
- Isabel Oliveira & José Dias, 2014.
"Disentangling the relation between wealth and contraceptive use in India: a multilevel probit regression approach,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 1001-1012, March.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:0040031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.