IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1000304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Population Genetics of dN/dS

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey Kryazhimskiy
  • Joshua B Plotkin

Abstract

Evolutionary pressures on proteins are often quantified by the ratio of substitution rates at non-synonymous and synonymous sites. The dN/dS ratio was originally developed for application to distantly diverged sequences, the differences among which represent substitutions that have fixed along independent lineages. Nevertheless, the dN/dS measure is often applied to sequences sampled from a single population, the differences among which represent segregating polymorphisms. Here, we study the expected dN/dS ratio for samples drawn from a single population under selection, and we find that in this context, dN/dS is relatively insensitive to the selection coefficient. Moreover, the hallmark signature of positive selection over divergent lineages, dN/dS>1, is violated within a population. For population samples, the relationship between selection and dN/dS does not follow a monotonic function, and so it may be impossible to infer selection pressures from dN/dS. These results have significant implications for the interpretation of dN/dS measurements among population-genetic samples.Author Summary: Since the time of Darwin, biologists have worked to identify instances of evolutionary adaptation. At the molecular scale, it is understood that adaptation should induce more genetic changes at amino acid altering sites in the genome, compared to amino acid–preserving sites. The ratio of substitution rates at such sites, denoted dN/dS, is therefore commonly used to detect proteins undergoing adaptation. This test was originally developed for application to distantly diverged genetic sequences, the differences among which represent substitutions along independent evolutionary lineages. Nonetheless, the dN/dS statistics are also frequently applied to genetic sequences sampled from a single population, the differences among which represent transient polymorphisms, not substitutions. Here, we show that the behavior of the dN/dS statistic is very different in these two cases. In particular, when applied to sequences from a single population, the dN/dS ratio is relatively insensitive to the strength of natural selection, and the anticipated signature of adaptive evolution, dN/dS>1, is violated. These results have implications for the interpretation of genetic variation sampled from a population. In particular, these results suggest that microbes may experience substantially stronger selective forces than previously thought.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey Kryazhimskiy & Joshua B Plotkin, 2008. "The Population Genetics of dN/dS," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1000304
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vivak Soni & John W. Terbot & Jeffrey D. Jensen, 2024. "Population genetic considerations regarding the interpretation of within-patient SARS-CoV-2 polymorphism data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-5, December.
    2. Jingqiu Liao & Liat Shenhav & Julia A. Urban & Myrna Serrano & Bin Zhu & Gregory A. Buck & Tal Korem, 2023. "Microdiversity of the vaginal microbiome is associated with preterm birth," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Caitlin S Pepperell & Amanda M Casto & Andrew Kitchen & Julie M Granka & Omar E Cornejo & Eddie C Holmes & Bruce Birren & James Galagan & Marcus W Feldman, 2013. "The Role of Selection in Shaping Diversity of Natural M. tuberculosis Populations," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Cassia Wagner & Kathryn E. Kistler & Garrett A. Perchetti & Noah Baker & Lauren A. Frisbie & Laura Marcela Torres & Frank Aragona & Cory Yun & Marlin Figgins & Alexander L. Greninger & Alex Cox & Hann, 2024. "Positive selection underlies repeated knockout of ORF8 in SARS-CoV-2 evolution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Andrea Fulgione & Célia Neto & Ahmed F. Elfarargi & Emmanuel Tergemina & Shifa Ansari & Mehmet Göktay & Herculano Dinis & Nina Döring & Pádraic J. Flood & Sofia Rodriguez-Pacheco & Nora Walden & Marcu, 2022. "Parallel reduction in flowering time from de novo mutations enable evolutionary rescue in colonizing lineages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1000304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.