IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1000287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic Analysis of Human Traits In Vitro: Drug Response and Gene Expression in Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines

Author

Listed:
  • Edwin Choy
  • Roman Yelensky
  • Sasha Bonakdar
  • Robert M Plenge
  • Richa Saxena
  • Philip L De Jager
  • Stanley Y Shaw
  • Cara S Wolfish
  • Jacqueline M Slavik
  • Chris Cotsapas
  • Manuel Rivas
  • Emmanouil T Dermitzakis
  • Ellen Cahir-McFarland
  • Elliott Kieff
  • David Hafler
  • Mark J Daly
  • David Altshuler

Abstract

Lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), originally collected as renewable sources of DNA, are now being used as a model system to study genotype–phenotype relationships in human cells, including searches for QTLs influencing levels of individual mRNAs and responses to drugs and radiation. In the course of attempting to map genes for drug response using 269 LCLs from the International HapMap Project, we evaluated the extent to which biological noise and non-genetic confounders contribute to trait variability in LCLs. While drug responses could be technically well measured on a given day, we observed significant day-to-day variability and substantial correlation to non-genetic confounders, such as baseline growth rates and metabolic state in culture. After correcting for these confounders, we were unable to detect any QTLs with genome-wide significance for drug response. A much higher proportion of variance in mRNA levels may be attributed to non-genetic factors (intra-individual variance—i.e., biological noise, levels of the EBV virus used to transform the cells, ATP levels) than to detectable eQTLs. Finally, in an attempt to improve power, we focused analysis on those genes that had both detectable eQTLs and correlation to drug response; we were unable to detect evidence that eQTL SNPs are convincingly associated with drug response in the model. While LCLs are a promising model for pharmacogenetic experiments, biological noise and in vitro artifacts may reduce power and have the potential to create spurious association due to confounding.Author Summary: The use of lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) has evolved from a renewable source of DNA to an in vitro model system to study the genetics of gene expression, drug response, and other traits in a controlled laboratory setting. While convincing relationships between SNPs and mRNA levels (eQTLs) have been described, the degree to which non-genetic variables also influence phenotypes in LCLs is less well characterized. In the course of attempting to map genes for drug responses in vitro, we evaluated the reproducibility of in vitro traits across replicates, the impact of the EBV virus used to transform B cells into cell lines, and the effect of in vitro culture conditions. We found that responses to at least some drugs and levels of many mRNAs can be technically well measured, but vary both across experiments and with non-genetic confounders such as growth rates, EBV levels, and ATP levels. The influence of such non-genetic factors can both decrease power to detect true relationships between DNA variation and traits and create the potential for non-genetic confounding and spurious associations between DNA variants and traits.

Suggested Citation

  • Edwin Choy & Roman Yelensky & Sasha Bonakdar & Robert M Plenge & Richa Saxena & Philip L De Jager & Stanley Y Shaw & Cara S Wolfish & Jacqueline M Slavik & Chris Cotsapas & Manuel Rivas & Emmanouil T , 2008. "Genetic Analysis of Human Traits In Vitro: Drug Response and Gene Expression in Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(11), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1000287
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000287
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000287&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1000287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.