Author
Listed:
- Alasdair D F Clarke
- Amelia R Hunt
- Anna E Hughes
Abstract
Foraging entails finding multiple targets sequentially. In humans and other animals, a key observation has been a tendency to forage in ‘runs’ of the same target type. This tendency is context-sensitive, and in humans, it is strongest when the targets are difficult to distinguish from the distractors. Many important questions have yet to be addressed about this and other tendencies in human foraging, and a key limitation is a lack of precise measures of foraging behaviour. The standard measures tend to be run statistics, such as the maximum run length and the number of runs. But these measures are not only interdependent, they are also constrained by the number and distribution of targets, making it difficult to make inferences about the effects of these aspects of the environment on foraging. Moreover, run statistics are underspecified about the underlying cognitive processes determining foraging behaviour. We present an alternative approach: modelling foraging as a procedure of generative sampling without replacement, implemented in a Bayesian multilevel model. This allows us to break behaviour down into a number of biases that influence target selection, such as the proximity of targets and a bias for selecting targets in runs, in a way that is not dependent on the number of targets present. Our method thereby facilitates direct comparison of specific foraging tendencies between search environments that differ in theoretically important dimensions. We demonstrate the use of our model with simulation examples and re-analysis of existing data. We believe our model will provide deeper insights into visual foraging and provide a foundation for further modelling work in this area.Author summary: Foraging has been well-studied in many species that rely on widely distributed food sources, such as bees and birds. Less well understood is how humans approach foraging tasks, and whether there are general policies we can identify that describe how we search for different categories of objects that can vary in quantity and distribution. We present a way to model foraging behaviour as a generative sampling without replacement procedure, implemented in a Bayesian multilevel model. This allows us to break down behaviour into a number of independent biases that influence target selection, including the proximity of targets, a bias for selecting targets in runs and a bias for a particular target type, in a way that is not dependent on the number of targets present. We believe this tool can open the door for foraging to become a standard task for refining our understanding of attention, working memory, prospective memory, learning, planning and decision-making.
Suggested Citation
Alasdair D F Clarke & Amelia R Hunt & Anna E Hughes, 2022.
"Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009813
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009813
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Shinohara, Shuji & Okamoto, Hiroshi & Manome, Nobuhito & Gunji, Pegio-Yukio & Nakajima, Yoshihiro & Moriyama, Toru & Chung, Ung-il, 2022.
"Simulation of foraging behavior using a decision-making agent with Bayesian and inverse Bayesian inference: Temporal correlations and power laws in displacement patterns,"
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.