Author
Listed:
- Mari Ganesh Kumar
- Ming Hu
- Aadhirai Ramanujan
- Mriganka Sur
- Hema A Murthy
Abstract
The visual cortex of the mouse brain can be divided into ten or more areas that each contain complete or partial retinotopic maps of the contralateral visual field. It is generally assumed that these areas represent discrete processing regions. In contrast to the conventional input-output characterizations of neuronal responses to standard visual stimuli, here we asked whether six of the core visual areas have responses that are functionally distinct from each other for a given visual stimulus set, by applying machine learning techniques to distinguish the areas based on their activity patterns. Visual areas defined by retinotopic mapping were examined using supervised classifiers applied to responses elicited by a range of stimuli. Using two distinct datasets obtained using wide-field and two-photon imaging, we show that the area labels predicted by the classifiers were highly consistent with the labels obtained using retinotopy. Furthermore, the classifiers were able to model the boundaries of visual areas using resting state cortical responses obtained without any overt stimulus, in both datasets. With the wide-field dataset, clustering neuronal responses using a constrained semi-supervised classifier showed graceful degradation of accuracy. The results suggest that responses from visual cortical areas can be classified effectively using data-driven models. These responses likely reflect unique circuits within each area that give rise to activity with stronger intra-areal than inter-areal correlations, and their responses to controlled visual stimuli across trials drive higher areal classification accuracy than resting state responses.Author summary: The visual cortex has a prominent role in the processing of visual information by the brain. Previous work has segmented the mouse visual cortex into different areas based on the organization of retinotopic maps. Here, we collect responses of the visual cortex to various types of stimuli and ask if we could discover unique clusters from this dataset using machine learning methods. The retinotopy based area borders are used as ground truth to compare the performance of our clustering algorithms. We show our results on two datasets, one collected by the authors using wide-field imaging and another a publicly available dataset collected using two-photon imaging. The proposed supervised approach is able to predict the area labels accurately using neuronal responses to various visual stimuli. Following up on these results using visual stimuli, we hypothesized that each area of the mouse brain has unique responses that can be used to classify the area independently of stimuli. Experiments using resting state responses, without any overt stimulus, confirm this hypothesis. Such activity-based segmentation of the mouse visual cortex suggests that large-scale imaging combined with a machine learning algorithm may enable new insights into the functional organization of the visual cortex in mice and other species.
Suggested Citation
Mari Ganesh Kumar & Ming Hu & Aadhirai Ramanujan & Mriganka Sur & Hema A Murthy, 2021.
"Functional parcellation of mouse visual cortex using statistical techniques reveals response-dependent clustering of cortical processing areas,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008548
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008548
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.