IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1008285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the sequence fitness landscape of a bridge between protein folds

Author

Listed:
  • Pengfei Tian
  • Robert B Best

Abstract

Most foldable protein sequences adopt only a single native fold. Recent protein design studies have, however, created protein sequences which fold into different structures apon changes of environment, or single point mutation, the best characterized example being the switch between the folds of the GA and GB binding domains of streptococcal protein G. To obtain further insight into the design of sequences which can switch folds, we have used a computational model for the fitness landscape of a single fold, built from the observed sequence variation of protein homologues. We have recently shown that such coevolutionary models can be used to design novel foldable sequences. By appropriately combining two of these models to describe the joint fitness landscape of GA and GB, we are able to describe the propensity of a given sequence for each of the two folds. We have successfully tested the combined model against the known series of designed GA/GB hybrids. Using Monte Carlo simulations on this landscape, we are able to identify pathways of mutations connecting the two folds. In the absence of a requirement for domain stability, the most frequent paths go via sequences in which neither domain is stably folded, reminiscent of the propensity for certain intrinsically disordered proteins to fold into different structures according to context. Even if the folded state is required to be stable, we find that there is nonetheless still a wide range of sequences which are close to the transition region and therefore likely fold switches, consistent with recent estimates that fold switching may be more widespread than had been thought.Author summary: While most proteins self-assemble (or “fold”) to a unique three-dimensional structure, a few have been identified that can fold into two distinct structures. These so-called “metamorphic” proteins that can switch folds have attracted a lot of recent interest, and it has been suggested that they may be much more widespread than currently appreciated. We have developed a computational model that captures the propensity of a given protein sequence to fold into either one of two specific structures (GA and GB), in order to investigate which sequences are able to fold to both GA and GB (“switch sequences”), versus just one of them. Our model predicts that there is a large number of switch sequences that could fold into both structures, but also that the most likely such sequences are those for which the folded structures have low stability, in agreement with available experimental data. This also suggests that intrinsically disordered proteins which can fold into different structures on binding may provide an evolutionary path in sequence space between protein folds.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengfei Tian & Robert B Best, 2020. "Exploring the sequence fitness landscape of a bridge between protein folds," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008285
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008285
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008285&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tobias Sikosek & Erich Bornberg-Bauer & Hue Sun Chan, 2012. "Evolutionary Dynamics on Protein Bi-stability Landscapes can Potentially Resolve Adaptive Conflicts," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Po-Ssu Huang & Scott E. Boyken & David Baker, 2016. "The coming of age of de novo protein design," Nature, Nature, vol. 537(7620), pages 320-327, September.
    3. Tobias Sikosek & Heinrich Krobath & Hue Sun Chan, 2016. "Theoretical Insights into the Biophysics of Protein Bi-stability and Evolutionary Switches," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Elena Facco & Andrea Pagnani & Elena Tea Russo & Alessandro Laio, 2019. "The intrinsic dimension of protein sequence evolution," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Devlina Chakravarty & Shwetha Sreenivasan & Liskin Swint-Kruse & Lauren L. Porter, 2023. "Identification of a covert evolutionary pathway between two protein folds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas W. Linsky & Kyle Noble & Autumn R. Tobin & Rachel Crow & Lauren Carter & Jeffrey L. Urbauer & David Baker & Eva-Maria Strauch, 2022. "Sampling of structure and sequence space of small protein folds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Jordan Yang & Nandita Naik & Jagdish Suresh Patel & Christopher S Wylie & Wenze Gu & Jessie Huang & F Marty Ytreberg & Mandar T Naik & Daniel M Weinreich & Brenda M Rubenstein, 2020. "Predicting the viability of beta-lactamase: How folding and binding free energies correlate with beta-lactamase fitness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Agnese I. Curatolo & Ofer Kimchi & Carl P. Goodrich & Ryan K. Krueger & Michael P. Brenner, 2023. "A computational toolbox for the assembly yield of complex and heterogeneous structures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Biao Ruan & Yanan He & Yingwei Chen & Eun Jung Choi & Yihong Chen & Dana Motabar & Tsega Solomon & Richard Simmerman & Thomas Kauffman & D. Travis Gallagher & John Orban & Philip N. Bryan, 2023. "Design and characterization of a protein fold switching network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Noelia Ferruz & Steffen Schmidt & Birte Höcker, 2022. "ProtGPT2 is a deep unsupervised language model for protein design," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Tobias Sikosek & Heinrich Krobath & Hue Sun Chan, 2016. "Theoretical Insights into the Biophysics of Protein Bi-stability and Evolutionary Switches," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, June.
    7. Evandro Ferrada, 2014. "The Amino Acid Alphabet and the Architecture of the Protein Sequence-Structure Map. I. Binary Alphabets," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Julia Skokowa & Birte Hernandez Alvarez & Murray Coles & Malte Ritter & Masoud Nasri & Jérémy Haaf & Narges Aghaallaei & Yun Xu & Perihan Mir & Ann-Christin Krahl & Katherine W. Rogers & Kateryna Maks, 2022. "A topological refactoring design strategy yields highly stable granulopoietic proteins," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Anton Kocheturov & Panos M. Pardalos & Athanasia Karakitsiou, 2019. "Massive datasets and machine learning for computational biomedicine: trends and challenges," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 276(1), pages 5-34, May.
    10. Baran Hashemi & Nikolai Hartmann & Sahand Sharifzadeh & James Kahn & Thomas Kuhr, 2024. "Ultra-high-granularity detector simulation with intra-event aware generative adversarial network and self-supervised relational reasoning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Fatima A. Davila-Hernandez & Biao Jin & Harley Pyles & Shuai Zhang & Zheming Wang & Timothy F. Huddy & Asim K. Bera & Alex Kang & Chun-Long Chen & James J. Yoreo & David Baker, 2023. "Directing polymorph specific calcium carbonate formation with de novo protein templates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Fabian Sesterhenn & Che Yang & Jaume Bonet & Johannes T. Cramer & Xiaolin Wen & Yimeng Wang & Chi I. Chiang & Luciano Andres Abriata & Iga Kucharska & Giacomo Castoro & Sabrina S. Vollers & Marie Gall, 2020. "De novo protein design enables the precise induction of RSV-neutralizing antibodies," Post-Print hal-02677103, HAL.
    13. SM Bargeen Alam Turzo & Justin T. Seffernick & Amber D. Rolland & Micah T. Donor & Sten Heinze & James S. Prell & Vicki H. Wysocki & Steffen Lindert, 2022. "Protein shape sampled by ion mobility mass spectrometry consistently improves protein structure prediction," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Smrithi Krishnan R & Kalyanashis Jana & Amina H. Shaji & Karthika S. Nair & Anjali Devi Das & Devika Vikraman & Harsha Bajaj & Ulrich Kleinekathöfer & Kozhinjampara R. Mahendran, 2022. "Assembly of transmembrane pores from mirror-image peptides," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Shunshi Kohyama & Béla P. Frohn & Leon Babl & Petra Schwille, 2024. "Machine learning-aided design and screening of an emergent protein function in synthetic cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Shuangjia Zheng & Tao Zeng & Chengtao Li & Binghong Chen & Connor W. Coley & Yuedong Yang & Ruibo Wu, 2022. "Deep learning driven biosynthetic pathways navigation for natural products with BioNavi-NP," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Sasha B. Ebrahimi & Devleena Samanta, 2023. "Engineering protein-based therapeutics through structural and chemical design," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Devlina Chakravarty & Shwetha Sreenivasan & Liskin Swint-Kruse & Lauren L. Porter, 2023. "Identification of a covert evolutionary pathway between two protein folds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Jose M. Martínez-Parra & Rebeca Gómez-Ojea & Geert A. Daudey & Martin Calvelo & Hector Fernández-Caro & Javier Montenegro & Julian Bergueiro, 2024. "Exo-chirality of the α-helix," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
    20. W. Clifford Boldridge & Ajasja Ljubetič & Hwangbeom Kim & Nathan Lubock & Dániel Szilágyi & Jonathan Lee & Andrej Brodnik & Roman Jerala & Sriram Kosuri, 2023. "A multiplexed bacterial two-hybrid for rapid characterization of protein–protein interactions and iterative protein design," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.