IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework to assess the quality and impact of bioinformatics training across ELIXIR

Author

Listed:
  • Kim T Gurwitz
  • Prakash Singh Gaur
  • Louisa J Bellis
  • Lee Larcombe
  • Eva Alloza
  • Balint Laszlo Balint
  • Alexander Botzki
  • Jure Dimec
  • Victoria Dominguez del Angel
  • Pedro L Fernandes
  • Eija Korpelainen
  • Roland Krause
  • Mateusz Kuzak
  • Loredana Le Pera
  • Brane Leskošek
  • Jessica M Lindvall
  • Diana Marek
  • Paula A Martinez
  • Tuur Muyldermans
  • Ståle Nygård
  • Patricia M Palagi
  • Hedi Peterson
  • Fotis Psomopoulos
  • Vojtech Spiwok
  • Celia W G van Gelder
  • Allegra Via
  • Marko Vidak
  • Daniel Wibberg
  • Sarah L Morgan
  • Gabriella Rustici

Abstract

ELIXIR is a pan-European intergovernmental organisation for life science that aims to coordinate bioinformatics resources in a single infrastructure across Europe; bioinformatics training is central to its strategy, which aims to develop a training community that spans all ELIXIR member states. In an evidence-based approach for strengthening bioinformatics training programmes across Europe, the ELIXIR Training Platform, led by the ELIXIR EXCELERATE Quality and Impact Assessment Subtask in collaboration with the ELIXIR Training Coordinators Group, has implemented an assessment strategy to measure quality and impact of its entire training portfolio. Here, we present ELIXIR’s framework for assessing training quality and impact, which includes the following: specifying assessment aims, determining what data to collect in order to address these aims, and our strategy for centralised data collection to allow for ELIXIR-wide analyses. In addition, we present an overview of the ELIXIR training data collected over the past 4 years. We highlight the importance of a coordinated and consistent data collection approach and the relevance of defining specific metrics and answer scales for consortium-wide analyses as well as for comparison of data across iterations of the same course.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim T Gurwitz & Prakash Singh Gaur & Louisa J Bellis & Lee Larcombe & Eva Alloza & Balint Laszlo Balint & Alexander Botzki & Jure Dimec & Victoria Dominguez del Angel & Pedro L Fernandes & Eija Korpel, 2020. "A framework to assess the quality and impact of bioinformatics training across ELIXIR," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007976
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007976
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007976&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelle D Brazas & B F Francis Ouellette, 2016. "Continuing Education Workshops in Bioinformatics Positively Impact Research and Careers," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Corinne S. Martin & Susanna Repo & Juan Arenas Márquez & Niklas Blomberg & Katharina B. Lauer & Xènia Pérez Sitjà & Premysl Velek & Ana M. P. Melo & Christine Stansberg & Francesca De Leo & Elina Grin, 2021. "Demonstrating public value to funders and other stakeholders—the journey of ELIXIR, a virtual and distributed research infrastructure for life science data," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(3), pages 497-510, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.