IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Noise-precision tradeoff in predicting combinations of mutations and drugs

Author

Listed:
  • Avichai Tendler
  • Anat Zimmer
  • Avi Mayo
  • Uri Alon

Abstract

Many biological problems involve the response to multiple perturbations. Examples include response to combinations of many drugs, and the effects of combinations of many mutations. Such problems have an exponentially large space of combinations, which makes it infeasible to cover the entire space experimentally. To overcome this problem, several formulae that predict the effect of drug combinations or fitness landscape values have been proposed. These formulae use the effects of single perturbations and pairs of perturbations to predict triplets and higher order combinations. Interestingly, different formulae perform best on different datasets. Here we use Pareto optimality theory to quantitatively explain why no formula is optimal for all datasets, due to an inherent bias-variance (noise-precision) tradeoff. We calculate the Pareto front of log-linear formulae and find that the optimal formula depends on properties of the dataset: the typical interaction strength and the experimental noise. This study provides an approach to choose a suitable prediction formula for a given dataset, in order to best overcome the combinatorial explosion problem.Author summary: Sometimes a combination of drugs works much better than each drug alone. Finding such drug cocktails is a pressing challenge in order to combat drug resistance and to improve drug effects. However, it is impossible to test all combinations of multiple drug experimentally. Therefore, researchers are looking for computational rather than experimental approaches to overcome this problem. One approach is to measure the effect of few drugs and plug it into a formula that predicts the effect of many drugs together. Existing prediction formulae typically perform best on the dataset that they were developed on, but less well on other datasets. Here we explain this observation and give a guide for the choice of an optimal prediction formula for a given dataset. The optimal formula depends on two main properties of the dataset: 1) The interaction strength between the drugs and 2) The experimental noise in the data. This study may help researchers discover effective combinations of multiple drugs and multiple perturbations in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Avichai Tendler & Anat Zimmer & Avi Mayo & Uri Alon, 2019. "Noise-precision tradeoff in predicting combinations of mutations and drugs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006956
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006956
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006956&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Itay Katzir & Murat Cokol & Bree B Aldridge & Uri Alon, 2019. "Prediction of ultra-high-order antibiotic combinations based on pairwise interactions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Jakub Otwinowski & Ilya Nemenman, 2013. "Genotype to Phenotype Mapping and the Fitness Landscape of the E. coli lac Promoter," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    3. Karen S. Sarkisyan & Dmitry A. Bolotin & Margarita V. Meer & Dinara R. Usmanova & Alexander S. Mishin & George V. Sharonov & Dmitry N. Ivankov & Nina G. Bozhanova & Mikhail S. Baranov & Onuralp Soylem, 2016. "Local fitness landscape of the green fluorescent protein," Nature, Nature, vol. 533(7603), pages 397-401, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alicia Sanchez-Gorostiaga & Djordje Bajić & Melisa L Osborne & Juan F Poyatos & Alvaro Sanchez, 2019. "High-order interactions distort the functional landscape of microbial consortia," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-34, December.
    2. Miller, Craig R. & Van Leuven, James T. & Wichman, Holly A. & Joyce, Paul, 2018. "Selecting among three basic fitness landscape models: Additive, multiplicative and stickbreaking," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 97-109.
    3. Mohan Bi & Huiying Li & Peter Meidl & Yanjie Zhu & Masahiro Ryo & Matthias C. Rillig, 2024. "Number and dissimilarity of global change factors influences soil properties and functions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.