Author
Listed:
- Santiago Guerrero
- Andrés López-Cortés
- Jennyfer M García-Cárdenas
- Pablo Saa
- Alberto Indacochea
- Isaac Armendáriz-Castillo
- Ana Karina Zambrano
- Verónica Yumiceba
- Andy Pérez-Villa
- Patricia Guevara-Ramírez
- Oswaldo Moscoso-Zea
- Joel Paredes
- Paola E Leone
- César Paz-y-Miño
Abstract
Scientific data recording and reporting systems are of a great interest for endorsing reproducibility and transparency practices among the scientific community. Current research generates large datasets that can no longer be documented using paper lab notebooks (PLNs). In this regard, electronic laboratory notebooks (ELNs) could be a promising solution to replace PLNs and promote scientific reproducibility and transparency. We previously analyzed five ELNs and performed two survey-based studies to implement an ELN in a biomedical research institute. Among the ELNs tested, we found that Microsoft OneNote presents numerous features related to ELN best functionalities. In addition, both surveyed groups preferred OneNote over a scientifically designed ELN (PerkinElmer Elements). However, OneNote remains a general note-taking application and has not been designed for scientific purposes. We therefore provide a quick guide to adapt OneNote to an ELN workflow that can also be adjusted to other nonscientific ELNs.
Suggested Citation
Santiago Guerrero & Andrés López-Cortés & Jennyfer M García-Cárdenas & Pablo Saa & Alberto Indacochea & Isaac Armendáriz-Castillo & Ana Karina Zambrano & Verónica Yumiceba & Andy Pérez-Villa & Patrici, 2019.
"A quick guide for using Microsoft OneNote as an electronic laboratory notebook,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-9, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006918
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006918
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.