Author
Listed:
- Laura Anton-Sanchez
- Felix Effenberger
- Concha Bielza
- Pedro Larrañaga
- Hermann Cuntz
Abstract
Neurons collect their inputs from other neurons by sending out arborized dendritic structures. However, the relationship between the shape of dendrites and the precise organization of synaptic inputs in the neural tissue remains unclear. Inputs could be distributed in tight clusters, entirely randomly or else in a regular grid-like manner. Here, we analyze dendritic branching structures using a regularity index R, based on average nearest neighbor distances between branch and termination points, characterizing their spatial distribution. We find that the distributions of these points depend strongly on cell types, indicating possible fundamental differences in synaptic input organization. Moreover, R is independent of cell size and we find that it is only weakly correlated with other branching statistics, suggesting that it might reflect features of dendritic morphology that are not captured by commonly studied branching statistics. We then use morphological models based on optimal wiring principles to study the relation between input distributions and dendritic branching structures. Using our models, we find that branch point distributions correlate more closely with the input distributions while termination points in dendrites are generally spread out more randomly with a close to uniform distribution. We validate these model predictions with connectome data. Finally, we find that in spatial input distributions with increasing regularity, characteristic scaling relationships between branching features are altered significantly. In summary, we conclude that local statistics of input distributions and dendrite morphology depend on each other leading to potentially cell type specific branching features.Author summary: Dendritic tree structures of nerve cells are built to optimally collect inputs from other cells in the circuit. By looking at how regularly the branch and termination points of dendrites are distributed, we find characteristic differences between cell types that correlate little with other traditional branching statistics and affect their scaling properties. Using computational models based on optimal wiring principles, we then show that termination points of dendrites generally spread more randomly than the inputs that they receive while branch points follow more closely the underlying input organization. Existing connectome data validate these predictions indicating the importance of our findings for large scale neural circuit analysis.
Suggested Citation
Laura Anton-Sanchez & Felix Effenberger & Concha Bielza & Pedro Larrañaga & Hermann Cuntz, 2018.
"A regularity index for dendrites - local statistics of a neuron's input space,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006593
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006593
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Yihwa Kim & Robert Sinclair & Nol Chindapol & Jaap A Kaandorp & Erik De Schutter, 2012.
"Geometric Theory Predicts Bifurcations in Minimal Wiring Cost Trees in Biology Are Flat,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-7, April.
- Benjamin Torben-Nielsen & Klaus M Stiefel, 2010.
"Wide-Field Motion Integration in Fly VS Cells: Insights from an Inverse Approach,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-10, September.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.