IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulations to benchmark time-varying connectivity methods for fMRI

Author

Listed:
  • William Hedley Thompson
  • Craig Geoffrey Richter
  • Pontus Plavén-Sigray
  • Peter Fransson

Abstract

There is a current interest in quantifying time-varying connectivity (TVC) based on neuroimaging data such as fMRI. Many methods have been proposed, and are being applied, revealing new insight into the brain’s dynamics. However, given that the ground truth for TVC in the brain is unknown, many concerns remain regarding the accuracy of proposed estimates. Since there exist many TVC methods it is difficult to assess differences in time-varying connectivity between studies. In this paper, we present tvc_benchmarker, which is a Python package containing four simulations to test TVC methods. Here, we evaluate five different methods that together represent a wide spectrum of current approaches to estimating TVC (sliding window, tapered sliding window, multiplication of temporal derivatives, spatial distance and jackknife correlation). These simulations were designed to test each method’s ability to track changes in covariance over time, which is a key property in TVC analysis. We found that all tested methods correlated positively with each other, but there were large differences in the strength of the correlations between methods. To facilitate comparisons with future TVC methods, we propose that the described simulations can act as benchmark tests for evaluation of methods. Using tvc_benchmarker researchers can easily add, compare and submit their own TVC methods to evaluate its performance.Author summary: Time-varying connectivity attempts to quantify the fluctuating covariance relationship between two or more regions through time. In recent years, it has become popular to do this with fMRI neuroimaging data. There have been many methods proposed to quantify time-varying connectivity, but very few attempts to systematically compare them. In this paper, we present tvc_benchmarker, which is a python package that consists of four simulations. The parameters of the data are justified on fMRI signal properties. Five different methods are evaluated in this paper, but other researchers can use tvc_benchmarker to evaluate their methodologies and their results can be submitted to be included in future reports. Methods are evaluated on their ability to track a fluctuating covariance parameter between time series. Of the evaluated methods, the jackknife correlation method performed the best at tracking a fluctuating covariance parameter in these four simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • William Hedley Thompson & Craig Geoffrey Richter & Pontus Plavén-Sigray & Peter Fransson, 2018. "Simulations to benchmark time-varying connectivity methods for fMRI," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006196
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006196
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006196&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srikanth Ryali & Kaustubh Supekar & Tianwen Chen & John Kochalka & Weidong Cai & Jonathan Nicholas & Aarthi Padmanabhan & Vinod Menon, 2016. "Temporal Dynamics and Developmental Maturation of Salience, Default and Central-Executive Network Interactions Revealed by Variational Bayes Hidden Markov Modeling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-29, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.