Author
Listed:
- David P Noren
- Byron L Long
- Raquel Norel
- Kahn Rrhissorrakrai
- Kenneth Hess
- Chenyue Wendy Hu
- Alex J Bisberg
- Andre Schultz
- Erik Engquist
- Li Liu
- Xihui Lin
- Gregory M Chen
- Honglei Xie
- Geoffrey A M Hunter
- Paul C Boutros
- Oleg Stepanov
- DREAM 9 AML-OPC Consortium
- Thea Norman
- Stephen H Friend
- Gustavo Stolovitzky
- Steven Kornblau
- Amina A Qutub
Abstract
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a fatal hematological cancer. The genetic abnormalities underlying AML are extremely heterogeneous among patients, making prognosis and treatment selection very difficult. While clinical proteomics data has the potential to improve prognosis accuracy, thus far, the quantitative means to do so have yet to be developed. Here we report the results and insights gained from the DREAM 9 Acute Myeloid Prediction Outcome Prediction Challenge (AML-OPC), a crowdsourcing effort designed to promote the development of quantitative methods for AML prognosis prediction. We identify the most accurate and robust models in predicting patient response to therapy, remission duration, and overall survival. We further investigate patient response to therapy, a clinically actionable prediction, and find that patients that are classified as resistant to therapy are harder to predict than responsive patients across the 31 models submitted to the challenge. The top two performing models, which held a high sensitivity to these patients, substantially utilized the proteomics data to make predictions. Using these models, we also identify which signaling proteins were useful in predicting patient therapeutic response.Author Summary: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a hematological cancer with a very low 5-year survival rate. It is a very heterogeneous disease, meaning that the molecular underpinnings that cause AML vary greatly among patients, necessitating the use of precision medicine for treatment. While this personalized approach could be greatly improved by the incorporation of high-throughput proteomics data into AML patient prognosis, the quantitative methods to do so are lacking. We held the DREAM 9 AML Outcome Prediction Challenge to foster support, collaboration, and participation from multiple scientific communities in order to solve this problem. The outcome of the challenge yielded several accurate methods (AUROC >0.78, BAC > 0.69) capable of predicting whether a patient would respond to therapy. Moreover, this study also determined aspects of the methods which enabled accurate predictions, as well as key signaling proteins that were informative to the most accurate models.
Suggested Citation
David P Noren & Byron L Long & Raquel Norel & Kahn Rrhissorrakrai & Kenneth Hess & Chenyue Wendy Hu & Alex J Bisberg & Andre Schultz & Erik Engquist & Li Liu & Xihui Lin & Gregory M Chen & Honglei Xie, 2016.
"A Crowdsourcing Approach to Developing and Assessing Prediction Algorithms for AML Prognosis,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004890
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004890
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.