Author
Listed:
- Tri Hieu Nim
- Le Luo
- Jacob K White
- Marie-Véronique Clément
- Lisa Tucker-Kellogg
Abstract
The dynamic behaviors of signaling pathways can provide clues to pathway mechanisms. In cancer cells, excessive phosphorylation and activation of the Akt pathway is responsible for cell survival advantages. In normal cells, serum stimulation causes brief peaks of extremely high Akt phosphorylation before reaching a moderate steady-state. Previous modeling assumed this peak and decline behavior (i.e., “overshoot”) was due to receptor internalization. In this work, we modeled the dynamics of the overshoot as a tool for gaining insight into Akt pathway function. We built an ordinary differential equation (ODE) model describing pathway activation immediately upstream of Akt phosphorylation at Thr308 (Aktp308). The model was fit to experimental measurements of Aktp308, total Akt, and phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3), from mouse embryonic fibroblasts with serum stimulation. The canonical Akt activation model (the null hypothesis) was unable to recapitulate the observed delay between the peak of PIP3 (at 2 minutes), and the peak of Aktp308 (at 30–60 minutes). From this we conclude that the peak and decline behavior of Aktp308 is not caused by PIP3 dynamics. Models for alternative hypotheses were constructed by allowing an arbitrary dynamic curve to perturb each of 5 steps of the pathway. All 5 of the alternative models could reproduce the observed delay. To distinguish among the alternatives, simulations suggested which species and timepoints would show strong differences. Time-series experiments with membrane fractionation and PI3K inhibition were performed, and incompatible hypotheses were excluded. We conclude that the peak and decline behavior of Aktp308 is caused by a non-canonical effect that retains Akt at the membrane, and not by receptor internalization. Furthermore, we provide a novel spline-based method for simulating the network implications of an unknown effect, and we demonstrate a process of hypothesis management for guiding efficient experiments.Author Summary: Influential pathways of cell signalling (such as PI3K/Akt) are routinely communicated using simple textbook-like diagrams that show only the most widely-accepted steps of the pathway. At the same time, there are countless other molecular influences relevant to each pathway, documented in the published literature, and more are being published every week. It should perhaps come as little surprise that during a routine observation of the Akt activation pathway, a simulation of the canonical model was mathematically incompatible with our observed dynamics. To progress beyond the standard, simplified model without testing an unreasonable number of molecular candidates individually, we employed computational modeling to analyze the dynamics of pathway activation. We asked when and where a non-canonical deviation could occur, relative to the canonical pathway. We used the timing of downstream activation to solve for the possible times of upstream initiation. By categorizing unknown effects by their dynamics, we were able to prune away implausible hypotheses using an efficient number of in vitro experiments. At the end we had a single plausible explanation for non-canonical Akt activation in our cells, and we confirmed experimentally that Akt is retained at the membrane after PIP3 is no longer present.
Suggested Citation
Tri Hieu Nim & Le Luo & Jacob K White & Marie-Véronique Clément & Lisa Tucker-Kellogg, 2015.
"Non-canonical Activation of Akt in Serum-Stimulated Fibroblasts, Revealed by Comparative Modeling of Pathway Dynamics,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004505
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004505
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- John D. Carpten & Andrew L. Faber & Candice Horn & Gregory P. Donoho & Stephen L. Briggs & Christiane M. Robbins & Galen Hostetter & Sophie Boguslawski & Tracy Y. Moses & Stephanie Savage & Mark Uhlik, 2007.
"A transforming mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 in cancer,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 448(7152), pages 439-444, July.
- Junjie Wang & Lisa Tucker-Kellogg & Inn Chuan Ng & Ruirui Jia & P S Thiagarajan & Jacob K White & Hanry Yu, 2014.
"The Self-Limiting Dynamics of TGF-β Signaling In Silico and In Vitro, with Negative Feedback through PPM1A Upregulation,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Jennifer B. Shah & Dana Pueschl & Bradley Wubbenhorst & Mengyao Fan & John Pluta & Kurt D’Andrea & Anna P. Hubert & Jake S. Shilan & Wenting Zhou & Adam A. Kraya & Alba Llop Guevara & Catherine Ruan &, 2022.
"Analysis of matched primary and recurrent BRCA1/2 mutation-associated tumors identifies recurrence-specific drivers,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
- Tripti Shrestha Bhattarai & Tambudzai Shamu & Alexander N. Gorelick & Matthew T. Chang & Debyani Chakravarty & Elena I. Gavrila & Mark T. A. Donoghue & JianJong Gao & Swati Patel & Sizhi Paul Gao & Ma, 2022.
"AKT mutant allele-specific activation dictates pharmacologic sensitivities,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.