IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Anticancer Drug Responses Using a Dual-Layer Integrated Cell Line-Drug Network Model

Author

Listed:
  • Naiqian Zhang
  • Haiyun Wang
  • Yun Fang
  • Jun Wang
  • Xiaoqi Zheng
  • X Shirley Liu

Abstract

The ability to predict the response of a cancer patient to a therapeutic agent is a major goal in modern oncology that should ultimately lead to personalized treatment. Existing approaches to predicting drug sensitivity rely primarily on profiling of cancer cell line panels that have been treated with different drugs and selecting genomic or functional genomic features to regress or classify the drug response. Here, we propose a dual-layer integrated cell line-drug network model, which uses both cell line similarity network (CSN) data and drug similarity network (DSN) data to predict the drug response of a given cell line using a weighted model. Using the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and Cancer Genome Project (CGP) studies as benchmark datasets, our single-layer model with CSN or DSN and only a single parameter achieved a prediction performance comparable to the previously generated elastic net model. When using the dual-layer model integrating both CSN and DSN, our predicted response reached a 0.6 Pearson correlation coefficient with observed responses for most drugs, which is significantly better than the previous results using the elastic net model. We have also applied the dual-layer cell line-drug integrated network model to fill in the missing drug response values in the CGP dataset. Even though the dual-layer integrated cell line-drug network model does not specifically model mutation information, it correctly predicted that BRAF mutant cell lines would be more sensitive than BRAF wild-type cell lines to three MEK1/2 inhibitors tested.Author Summary: In this study, using the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and Cancer Genome Project (CGP) studies as benchmark datasets, we explored the application of similarity information between cell lines and drugs in drug response prediction. We found that similar cell lines by gene expression profiles exhibit similar response to the same drug. Meanwhile, drugs with similar chemical structures also show similar inhibitory effects across different cell lines. Based on the above observations, we proposed a dual-layer network and local weighted model to predict drug response of a cell line using proximal information of the drug-cell line network. The only three parameters of our model are optimized by leave-one-out cross-validation for each drug. Two case studies of MAPK and ERK signal pathways on CCLE dataset proved that the predicted-to-observed correlations of our dual-layer network model is significantly better than the previous predictor using elastic net model. Interestingly, predictions based on drug similarity network (DSN) alone were much better than those based on cell line similarity network (CSN) alone for most drugs, implying that drug similarities are more informative for drug response prediction than cell line similarities. Our network model can be applied to predict the response of a new cell line to existing already tested drugs or to predict the response of an existing cell line to new drugs, thus potentially saving the cost in a drug-cell line screening.

Suggested Citation

  • Naiqian Zhang & Haiyun Wang & Yun Fang & Jun Wang & Xiaoqi Zheng & X Shirley Liu, 2015. "Predicting Anticancer Drug Responses Using a Dual-Layer Integrated Cell Line-Drug Network Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004498
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004498
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004498&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004498?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Haibe-Kains & Nehme El-Hachem & Nicolai Juul Birkbak & Andrew C. Jin & Andrew H. Beck & Hugo J. W. L. Aerts & John Quackenbush, 2013. "Inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies," Nature, Nature, vol. 504(7480), pages 389-393, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. E Tejera & I Carrera & Karina Jimenes-Vargas & V Armijos-Jaramillo & A Sánchez-Rodríguez & M Cruz-Monteagudo & Y Perez-Castillo, 2019. "Cell fishing: A similarity based approach and machine learning strategy for multiple cell lines-compound sensitivity prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-11, October.
    2. John P Lloyd & Matthew B Soellner & Sofia D Merajver & Jun Z Li, 2021. "Impact of between-tissue differences on pan-cancer predictions of drug sensitivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, February.
    3. JungHo Kong & Doyeon Ha & Juhun Lee & Inhae Kim & Minhyuk Park & Sin-Hyeog Im & Kunyoo Shin & Sanguk Kim, 2022. "Network-based machine learning approach to predict immunotherapy response in cancer patients," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Kusch & Andreas Schuppert, 2020. "Two-step multi-omics modelling of drug sensitivity in cancer cell lines to identify driving mechanisms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Paul Geeleher & Nancy Cox & R Stephanie Huang, 2014. "pRRophetic: An R Package for Prediction of Clinical Chemotherapeutic Response from Tumor Gene Expression Levels," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-3, September.
    3. Xiao-Song Wang & Sanghoon Lee & Han Zhang & Gong Tang & Yue Wang, 2022. "An integral genomic signature approach for tailored cancer therapy using genome-wide sequencing data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Elisabeth Prince & Jennifer Cruickshank & Wail Ba-Alawi & Kelsey Hodgson & Jillian Haight & Chantal Tobin & Andrew Wakeman & Alona Avoulov & Valentina Topolskaia & Mitchell J. Elliott & Alison P. McGu, 2022. "Biomimetic hydrogel supports initiation and growth of patient-derived breast tumor organoids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Adrià Fernández-Torras & Miquel Duran-Frigola & Martino Bertoni & Martina Locatelli & Patrick Aloy, 2022. "Integrating and formatting biomedical data as pre-calculated knowledge graph embeddings in the Bioteque," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Jurica Levatić & Marina Salvadores & Francisco Fuster-Tormo & Fran Supek, 2022. "Mutational signatures are markers of drug sensitivity of cancer cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Caitlin E. Mills & Kartik Subramanian & Marc Hafner & Mario Niepel & Luca Gerosa & Mirra Chung & Chiara Victor & Benjamin Gaudio & Clarence Yapp & Ajit J. Nirmal & Nicholas Clark & Peter K. Sorger, 2022. "Multiplexed and reproducible high content screening of live and fixed cells using Dye Drop," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. David A Knowles & Gina Bouchard & Sylvia Plevritis, 2019. "Sparse discriminative latent characteristics for predicting cancer drug sensitivity from genomic features," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.