IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Adapting Auditory-motor Feedback Loop Can Contribute to Generating Vocal Repetition

Author

Listed:
  • Jason D Wittenbach
  • Kristofer E Bouchard
  • Michael S Brainard
  • Dezhe Z Jin

Abstract

Consecutive repetition of actions is common in behavioral sequences. Although integration of sensory feedback with internal motor programs is important for sequence generation, if and how feedback contributes to repetitive actions is poorly understood. Here we study how auditory feedback contributes to generating repetitive syllable sequences in songbirds. We propose that auditory signals provide positive feedback to ongoing motor commands, but this influence decays as feedback weakens from response adaptation during syllable repetitions. Computational models show that this mechanism explains repeat distributions observed in Bengalese finch song. We experimentally confirmed two predictions of this mechanism in Bengalese finches: removal of auditory feedback by deafening reduces syllable repetitions; and neural responses to auditory playback of repeated syllable sequences gradually adapt in sensory-motor nucleus HVC. Together, our results implicate a positive auditory-feedback loop with adaptation in generating repetitive vocalizations, and suggest sensory adaptation is important for feedback control of motor sequences.Author Summary: Repetitions are common in animal vocalizations. Songs of many songbirds contain syllables that repeat a variable number of times, with non-Markovian distributions of repeat counts. The neural mechanism underlying such syllable repetitions is unknown. In this work, we show that auditory feedback plays an important role in sustaining syllable repetitions in the Bengalese finch. Deafening reduces syllable repetitions and skews the repeat number distribution towards short repeats. These effects are explained with our computational model, which suggests that syllable repeats are initially sustained by auditory feedback to the neural networks that drive the syllable production. The feedback strength weakens as the syllable repeats, increasing the likelihood that the syllable repetition stops. Neural recordings confirm such adaptation of auditory feedback to the auditory-motor circuit in the Bengalese finch. Our results suggests that sensory feedback can directly impact repetitions in motor sequences, and may provide insights into neural mechanisms of speech disorders such as stuttering.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason D Wittenbach & Kristofer E Bouchard & Michael S Brainard & Dezhe Z Jin, 2015. "An Adapting Auditory-motor Feedback Loop Can Contribute to Generating Vocal Repetition," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-29, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004471
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004471
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004471&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.