IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3001144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative proteome comparison of human hearts with those of model organisms

Author

Listed:
  • Nora Linscheid
  • Alberto Santos
  • Pi Camilla Poulsen
  • Robert W Mills
  • Kirstine Calloe
  • Ulrike Leurs
  • Johan Z Ye
  • Christian Stolte
  • Morten B Thomsen
  • Bo H Bentzen
  • Pia R Lundegaard
  • Morten S Olesen
  • Lars J Jensen
  • Jesper V Olsen
  • Alicia Lundby

Abstract

Delineating human cardiac pathologies and their basic molecular mechanisms relies on research conducted in model organisms. Yet translating findings from preclinical models to humans present a significant challenge, in part due to differences in cardiac protein expression between humans and model organisms. Proteins immediately determine cellular function, yet their large-scale investigation in hearts has lagged behind those of genes and transcripts. Here, we set out to bridge this knowledge gap: By analyzing protein profiles in humans and commonly used model organisms across cardiac chambers, we determine their commonalities and regional differences. We analyzed cardiac tissue from each chamber of human, pig, horse, rat, mouse, and zebrafish in biological replicates. Using mass spectrometry–based proteomics workflows, we measured and evaluated the abundance of approximately 7,000 proteins in each species. The resulting knowledgebase of cardiac protein signatures is accessible through an online database: atlas.cardiacproteomics.com. Our combined analysis allows for quantitative evaluation of protein abundances across cardiac chambers, as well as comparisons of cardiac protein profiles across model organisms. Up to a quarter of proteins with differential abundances between atria and ventricles showed opposite chamber-specific enrichment between species; these included numerous proteins implicated in cardiac disease. The generated proteomics resource facilitates translational prospects of cardiac studies from model organisms to humans by comparisons of disease-linked protein networks across species.This study provides protein abundance profiles for thousands of proteins across cardiac chambers for humans and five commonly used model organisms. This quantitative proteomics dataset represents the most comprehensive such resource to date, and can be queried via a web browser to identify the most appropriate model organism for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Nora Linscheid & Alberto Santos & Pi Camilla Poulsen & Robert W Mills & Kirstine Calloe & Ulrike Leurs & Johan Z Ye & Christian Stolte & Morten B Thomsen & Bo H Bentzen & Pia R Lundegaard & Morten S O, 2021. "Quantitative proteome comparison of human hearts with those of model organisms," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001144
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001144
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001144&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathias Wilhelm & Judith Schlegl & Hannes Hahne & Amin Moghaddas Gholami & Marcus Lieberenz & Mikhail M. Savitski & Emanuel Ziegler & Lars Butzmann & Siegfried Gessulat & Harald Marx & Toby Mathieson , 2014. "Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome," Nature, Nature, vol. 509(7502), pages 582-587, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karl K. Krull & Syed Azmal Ali & Jeroen Krijgsveld, 2024. "Enhanced feature matching in single-cell proteomics characterizes IFN-γ response and co-existence of cell states," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Xiaojuan Fan & Yun Yang & Chuyun Chen & Zefeng Wang, 2022. "Pervasive translation of circular RNAs driven by short IRES-like elements," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Angela Re & Levi Waldron & Alessandro Quattrone, 2016. "Control of Gene Expression by RNA Binding Protein Action on Alternative Translation Initiation Sites," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.