IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3001102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How PLOS Biology aims to foster diversity, equity and inclusion in science

Author

Listed:
  • The PLOS Biology Staff Editors

Abstract

A diverse scientific community is not only fairer but also improves science overall by bringing a richer range of perspectives to the research enterprise. Here, we discuss steps that PLOS Biology is taking to support diversity, equity and inclusion at the journal and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • The PLOS Biology Staff Editors, 2021. "How PLOS Biology aims to foster diversity, equity and inclusion in science," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-3, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001102
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001102
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001102&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leo Chan Gaskins & Craig R McClain, 2021. "Visible name changes promote inequity for transgender researchers," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-4, March.
    2. Robinson W Fulweiler & Sarah W Davies & Jennifer F Biddle & Amy J Burgin & Emily H G Cooperdock & Torrance C Hanley & Carly D Kenkel & Amy M Marcarelli & Catherine M Matassa & Talea L Mayo & Lory Z Sa, 2021. "Rebuild the Academy: Supporting academic mothers during COVID-19 and beyond," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah W Davies & Hollie M Putnam & Tracy Ainsworth & Julia K Baum & Colleen B Bove & Sarah C Crosby & Isabelle M Côté & Anne Duplouy & Robinson W Fulweiler & Alyssa J Griffin & Torrance C Hanley & Tes, 2021. "Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.