Author
Listed:
- Alexander J Mastin
- Timothy R Gottwald
- Frank van den Bosch
- Nik J Cunniffe
- Stephen Parnell
Abstract
Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) of plants continue to devastate ecosystems and livelihoods worldwide. Effective management requires surveillance to detect epidemics at an early stage. However, despite the increasing use of risk-based surveillance programs in plant health, it remains unclear how best to target surveillance resources to achieve this. We combine a spatially explicit model of pathogen entry and spread with a statistical model of detection and use a stochastic optimisation routine to identify which arrangement of surveillance sites maximises the probability of detecting an invading epidemic. Our approach reveals that it is not always optimal to target the highest-risk sites and that the optimal strategy differs depending on not only patterns of pathogen entry and spread but also the choice of detection method. That is, we find that spatial correlation in risk can make it suboptimal to focus solely on the highest-risk sites, meaning that it is best to avoid ‘putting all your eggs in one basket’. However, this depends on an interplay with other factors, such as the sensitivity of available detection methods. Using the economically important arboreal disease huanglongbing (HLB), we demonstrate how our approach leads to a significant performance gain and cost saving in comparison with conventional methods to targeted surveillance.Emerging infectious diseases of plants continue to devastate ecosystems and livelihoods worldwide. By linking a mathematical model of pest spread with a computational optimisation routine, this study identifies where to look for invasive pests if we wish to detect them at an early stage; this method improves upon conventional methods of risk-based surveillance and is robust to model misspecification.
Suggested Citation
Alexander J Mastin & Timothy R Gottwald & Frank van den Bosch & Nik J Cunniffe & Stephen Parnell, 2020.
"Optimising risk-based surveillance for early detection of invasive plant pathogens,"
PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-25, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000863
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000863
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.