IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3000049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fifteen years in, what next for PLOS Biology?

Author

Listed:
  • The PLOS Biology Staff Editors

Abstract

As we celebrate our anniversary, the PLOS Biology editors discuss recent initiatives taken by the journal (meta-research, complementary research policy, preprint posting, short reports, methods and resources, data policy, protocols.io) and look ahead to the next fifteen years.

Suggested Citation

  • The PLOS Biology Staff Editors, 2018. "Fifteen years in, what next for PLOS Biology?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-5, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000049
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000049
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000049&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodora Bloom & Emma Ganley & Margaret Winker, 2014. "Data Access for the Open Access Literature: PLOS's Data Policy," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-3, February.
    2. Theodora Bloom & Emma Ganley & Margaret Winker, 2014. "Data Access for the Open Access Literature: PLOS's Data Policy," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-3, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominique G Roche & Loeske E B Kruuk & Robert Lanfear & Sandra A Binning, 2015. "Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Liwei Zhang & Liang Ma, 2021. "Does open data boost journal impact: evidence from Chinese economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3393-3419, April.
    3. Liwei Zhang & Liang Ma, 2023. "Is open science a double-edged sword?: data sharing and the changing citation pattern of Chinese economics articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2803-2818, May.
    4. Laura Bowering Mullen, 2024. "Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1_suppl), pages 21582440231, April.
    5. The PLOS Medicine Editors, 2015. "Transparency in Reporting Observational Studies: Reflections after a Year," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-4, October.
    6. Maxim Grechkin & Hoifung Poon & Bill Howe, 2017. "Wide-Open: Accelerating public data release by automating detection of overdue datasets," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-5, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.