IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/1002477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Authentication: A Standard Problem or a Problem of Standards?

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Capes-Davis
  • Richard M Neve

Abstract

Reproducibility and transparency in biomedical sciences have been called into question, and scientists have been found wanting as a result. Putting aside deliberate fraud, there is evidence that a major contributor to lack of reproducibility is insufficient quality assurance of reagents used in preclinical research. Cell lines are widely used in biomedical research to understand fundamental biological processes and disease states, yet most researchers do not perform a simple, affordable test to authenticate these key resources. Here, we provide a synopsis of the problems we face and how standards can contribute to an achievable solution.A major contributor to lack of reproducibility in preclinical research is insufficient quality assurance of reagents used. This article examines the problems surrounding the authentication of cell lines and discusses potential solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Capes-Davis & Richard M Neve, 2016. "Authentication: A Standard Problem or a Problem of Standards?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-7, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1002477
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002477
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002477&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1002477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.