IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/1002339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controlled Access under Review: Improving the Governance of Genomic Data Access

Author

Listed:
  • Mahsa Shabani
  • Stephanie O M Dyke
  • Yann Joly
  • Pascal Borry

Abstract

In parallel with massive genomic data production, data sharing practices have rapidly expanded over the last decade. To ensure authorized access to data, access review by data access committees (DACs) has been utilized as one potential solution. Here we discuss core elements to be integrated into the fabric of access review by both established and emerging DACs in order to foster fair, efficient, and responsible access to datasets. We particularly highlight the fact that the access review process could be adversely influenced by the potential conflicts of interest of data producers, particularly when they are directly involved in DACs management. Therefore, in structuring DACs and access procedures, possible data withholding by data producers should receive thorough attention.This Perspective examines the potentially adverse influence of primary researchers on the openness of genomic data sharing and recommends changes to data access review procedures to mitigate this.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahsa Shabani & Stephanie O M Dyke & Yann Joly & Pascal Borry, 2015. "Controlled Access under Review: Improving the Governance of Genomic Data Access," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-6, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1002339
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002339
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002339&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1002339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.