IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/1002169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Host–Pathogen Coevolution: The Selective Advantage of Bacillus thuringiensis Virulence and Its Cry Toxin Genes

Author

Listed:
  • Leila Masri
  • Antoine Branca
  • Anna E Sheppard
  • Andrei Papkou
  • David Laehnemann
  • Patrick S Guenther
  • Swantje Prahl
  • Manja Saebelfeld
  • Jacqueline Hollensteiner
  • Heiko Liesegang
  • Elzbieta Brzuszkiewicz
  • Rolf Daniel
  • Nicolaas K Michiels
  • Rebecca D Schulte
  • Joachim Kurtz
  • Philip Rosenstiel
  • Arndt Telschow
  • Erich Bornberg-Bauer
  • Hinrich Schulenburg

Abstract

Reciprocal coevolution between host and pathogen is widely seen as a major driver of evolution and biological innovation. Yet, to date, the underlying genetic mechanisms and associated trait functions that are unique to rapid coevolutionary change are generally unknown. We here combined experimental evolution of the bacterial biocontrol agent Bacillus thuringiensis and its nematode host Caenorhabditis elegans with large-scale phenotyping, whole genome analysis, and functional genetics to demonstrate the selective benefit of pathogen virulence and the underlying toxin genes during the adaptation process. We show that: (i) high virulence was specifically favoured during pathogen–host coevolution rather than pathogen one-sided adaptation to a nonchanging host or to an environment without host; (ii) the pathogen genotype BT-679 with known nematocidal toxin genes and high virulence specifically swept to fixation in all of the independent replicate populations under coevolution but only some under one-sided adaptation; (iii) high virulence in the BT-679-dominated populations correlated with elevated copy numbers of the plasmid containing the nematocidal toxin genes; (iv) loss of virulence in a toxin-plasmid lacking BT-679 isolate was reconstituted by genetic reintroduction or external addition of the toxins. We conclude that sustained coevolution is distinct from unidirectional selection in shaping the pathogen's genome and life history characteristics. To our knowledge, this study is the first to characterize the pathogen genes involved in coevolutionary adaptation in an animal host–pathogen interaction system.A combination of experimental evolution with large-scale phenotyping, genomics and functional genetics reveals the specific role of virulence and toxin genes during the evolutionary adaptation of a pathogen to an animal host.Author Summary: Evolution can be extremely fast and dramatic, especially when infectious disease agents such as bacterial pathogens engage in a continuous arms race with their host organism. Rounds of novel pathogen attack strategies and associated host counterdefenses conspire to drive host–pathogen coevolution and biological innovation. To better understand the underlying genetic mechanisms and the exact trait characteristics under selection, we conducted experimental evolution using a simple host–pathogen model system (nematode versus bacterium) under controlled laboratory conditions. We analysed the associated adaptive changes in real time using large-scale phenotyping, population whole genome sequencing, and genetic analysis of the identified candidate genes. We show that coevolution (rather than one-sided adaptation) particularly favors and maintains pathogen virulence, and that two specific toxin genes significantly influence this virulence during coevolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Leila Masri & Antoine Branca & Anna E Sheppard & Andrei Papkou & David Laehnemann & Patrick S Guenther & Swantje Prahl & Manja Saebelfeld & Jacqueline Hollensteiner & Heiko Liesegang & Elzbieta Brzusz, 2015. "Host–Pathogen Coevolution: The Selective Advantage of Bacillus thuringiensis Virulence and Its Cry Toxin Genes," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1002169
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002169
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002169&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1002169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.