IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/0030208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Giorgio Vallortigara
  • Lucia Regolin
  • Fabio Marconato

Abstract

When only a small number of points of light attached to the torso and limbs of a moving organism are visible, the animation correctly conveys the animal's activity. Here we report that newly hatched chicks, reared and hatched in darkness, at their first exposure to point-light animation sequences, exhibit a spontaneous preference to approach biological motion patterns. Intriguingly, this predisposition is not specific for the motion of a hen, but extends to the pattern of motion of other vertebrates, even to that of a potential predator such as a cat. The predisposition seems to reflect the existence of a mechanism in the brain aimed at orienting the young animal towards objects that move semi-rigidly (as vertebrate animals do), thus facilitating learning, i.e., through imprinting, about their more specific features of motion. Taking advantage of the spontaneous imprinting behaviour of newly hatched chicks, Giorgio Vallortigara and colleagues study their innate ability to distinguish biological motion.

Suggested Citation

  • Giorgio Vallortigara & Lucia Regolin & Fabio Marconato, 2005. "Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(7), pages 1-1, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:0030208
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0030208
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0030208&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:0030208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.