IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijppar/v12y2025i1p48-67id4155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical and cultural guidelines in the labyrinth of Kazakhstan’s civil service

Author

Listed:
  • Yermek Buribayev
  • Zhanna Khamzina

Abstract

This study examines the weak regulation of ethical standards and deficiencies in the organizational culture of Kazakhstan’s civil service. Despite existing legal frameworks governing ethical aspects of public administration, their implementation remains inconsistent, leading to a decline in professionalism, discipline, and governance effectiveness. The study employs an interdisciplinary approach, integrating legal, sociological, and managerial perspectives to analyze structural and procedural weaknesses in ethical regulation. A comprehensive analytical framework assesses existing legal acts, institutional mechanisms, and organizational practices, identifying gaps that undermine administrative performance. The findings highlight insufficient regulatory oversight and weak adherence to ethical norms, which negatively impact service delivery and public trust in government institutions. Without a well-defined system for enforcing ethical standards, even the most ambitious public administration reforms risk ineffectiveness. Ethical norms and a structured organizational culture are essential instruments for enhancing public service efficiency, fostering accountability, and maintaining citizens' trust. Strengthening enforcement mechanisms is crucial for sustainable administrative development. This study provides actionable recommendations for modernizing Kazakhstan’s civil service, proposing strategies to enhance ethical compliance, improve institutional accountability, and reinforce professional integrity. These insights may also be applied to similar national administrative systems facing comparable governance challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Yermek Buribayev & Zhanna Khamzina, 2025. "Ethical and cultural guidelines in the labyrinth of Kazakhstan’s civil service," International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 12(1), pages 48-67.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijppar:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:48-67:id:4155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/74/article/view/4155/8511
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijppar:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:48-67:id:4155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/74/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.