IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v7y2019i2p54-65id583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lecture Method Preferences, Auditory or Visual, of Ukrainian Consumers of Educational Services : A Statistical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Valery Okulich-Kazarin
  • Mykola Zhurba
  • Oksana Pagava
  • Iryna Kalko
  • Iyuriy Serbin

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the lecture method preferences of Ukrainian consumers of educational services. The study has observed two popular methods of providing educational services: the auditory method and the visual method. Research methodology included: information research; questioning and statistical processing of questionnaires; graphical representation of results and verification of statistical hypotheses. The sampling included two groups of students and one group of school teachers. It was statistically proved that Ukrainian students prefer the visual method of lectures but not the auditory method in availing educational services. Since the results are strongly significant, they have a great practical importance, recommending university teachers to use visual methods of lectures more than auditory while providing educational services. This will help them to adapt their lecture form and technique according to the needs and preferences of students as consumers of educational services. In addition, the results will also be useful to design and formulate training programs for teachers of Ukrainian Universities and making policy design for the Ukrainian Higher Education.

Suggested Citation

  • Valery Okulich-Kazarin & Mykola Zhurba & Oksana Pagava & Iryna Kalko & Iyuriy Serbin, 2019. "Lecture Method Preferences, Auditory or Visual, of Ukrainian Consumers of Educational Services : A Statistical Analysis," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 7(2), pages 54-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:54-65:id:583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/583/843
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/583/3740
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:54-65:id:583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.