IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v4y2016i1p12-20id508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Training Dilemma: Three Teachers’ Views of CPD

Author

Listed:
  • Ramesh Rao Ramanaidu
  • Kuruvilla C.K Joseph
  • Ravichantiran Arujunan

Abstract

Continuous professional development (CPD) courses enable teachers to keep up with the latest developments in the field of teaching and learning. However the modus operandi of conducting and delivering CPD courses is constantly questioned. The purpose of this research is to explore the issues related to the conducting and delivery of a CPD course. For the purpose of this study, three teachers who attended a CPD course were chosen. An interview protocol with ten open-ended questions was used to solicit information related to their experience in conducting an in-house course in their respective schools. The responses from the open-ended questions revealed that the teachers were unable to render the same experience to their colleagues due to a variety of reasons such as time factor, priority given by the school administrators and a lack of confidence. The findings suggest that the course organisers should stipulate the amount of time every school should allocate when conducting in-house courses and sufficient time should be allocated to teachers attending CPD to practise what they have learnt before they are asked to conduct an in-house course.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramesh Rao Ramanaidu & Kuruvilla C.K Joseph & Ravichantiran Arujunan, 2016. "The Training Dilemma: Three Teachers’ Views of CPD," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 4(1), pages 12-20.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:12-20:id:508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/508/710
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:12-20:id:508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.