IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v13y2025i2p552-565id4072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of the three-semester system on primary grade children's motivation: Perspectives from mothers

Author

Listed:
  • Soha Badawy Mansour
  • Samia Mokhtar Shahpo
  • Hanaa Ali Abualsoud
  • Nuha Alfadil
  • Refka Makram Barsom

Abstract

In the past two academic years, the Saudi Ministry of Education has implemented a three-semester system dividing the academic year into three 13-week terms instead of the traditional two-semester format. This study aims to explore the practical application of the three-semester system and its impact on primary grade children's motivation from their mothers' perspectives. This research involved 250 mothers of children in the first three grades of primary school in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. A quantitative descriptive approach was used to systematically collect and analyze data regarding the phenomenon. Data were gathered through two questionnaires: one assessing the implementation of the three-semester system in primary grades and another evaluating children's achievement motivation. Findings indicate that the increased school duties and assignments under the three-semester system have significantly burdened children compared to the two-semester system. Additionally, no statistically significant differences were found in achievement motivation between boys and girls. Overall, most mothers expressed disagreement with the three-semester system reflected in an average rating of 0.24 and a standard deviation of 0.59. This study sheds light on the implications of the new system on children's motivation and highlights concerns raised by mothers.

Suggested Citation

  • Soha Badawy Mansour & Samia Mokhtar Shahpo & Hanaa Ali Abualsoud & Nuha Alfadil & Refka Makram Barsom, 2025. "The impact of the three-semester system on primary grade children's motivation: Perspectives from mothers," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 13(2), pages 552-565.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:552-565:id:4072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/4072/8437
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:552-565:id:4072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.